The Principle of the Inadmissibility of Arbitrary Interference in Family Affairs
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-181-188
Abstract
The article investigates one of the fundamental principles of family law aimed at clarifying the boundaries between legal and arbitrary interference of the state and third parties in the affairs of the family. The Author argues that acts committed in accordance with the law and contrary to the principle of proportionality and proportionality do not constitute arbitrary interference in the affairs of the family. It is noted that at the moment the normative implementation of the principle of prohibition of voluntary interference in family affairs is controversial. On the one hand, the decriminalization of family violence is decreasing interference of state and society in the family business, on the other hand, we see the strengthening of the role of the juvenile justice system, which means the increase of state intervention in the affairs of the family.
About the Author
A. Ya. Ryzhenkov
Kalmyk State University named after B. B. Gorodovikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ryzhenkov Anatolii Ya., Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor
11 Pushkina st., Elista, Republic of Kalmykia, 358000
References
1. Bondarenko N. L. Ustranenie probelov v grazhdanskom zakonodatel’stve v tselyakh zashchity prav fizicheskikh lits i realizatsii printsipov grazhdanskogo prava [Bridging Gaps in Civil Law in Order to Protect the Rights of Individuals and ¬Implement the Civil Principles]. Aktual’nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava – Actual Problems of Civil Law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 6–18.
2. Vavilin E. V. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav [The Exercise and Protection of Civil Rights]. Moscow, 2009. 338 p.
3. Mozolin V. P., Maslyaev A. I. (Eds.). Grazhdanskoe pravo. Ch. 1 [Civil Law. Part 1]. Moscow, 2005. 719 p.
4. Deryugina T. V. Printsipy osushchestvleniya grazhdanskikh prav [The Principles of the Exercise of Civil Rights]. Moscow, 2010. 188 p.
5. Dikova I. A. Regulirovanie otnoshenii, voznikayushchikh pri primenenii vspomogatel’nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii, v semeinom i grazhdanskom prave Rossii. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Regulation of Relations Arising from the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Family and Civil Law of Russia. Ext. Abstr. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, 2011. 24 p.
6. Zamrii O. N. O predposylkakh zloupotrebleniya publichnym interesom so storony organov opeki i popechitel’stva [On the Premises of Abuse of Public Interest By the Guardianship Authorities]. Sed’moi permskii kongress uchenykh-yuristov – Seventh Perm Congress of Legal Scholars. Perm, 2016, pp. 129–132.
7. Kashanina T. V. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v sovetskom prave [Valuation Concepts in Soviet Law]. Pravovedenie, 1976, no. 1, pp. 25–31.
8. Kornakova S. V., Chigrina E. V. Nedopustimost’ proizvol’nogo vmeshatel’stva v dela sem’i gosudarstvennykh organov i dolzhnostnykh lits cherez prizmu sotsial’nogo patronata [Inadmissibility of Arbitrary Interference in Family Affairs by Governmental Agencies and Officials Through the Prism of Social Patronage]. Baikal Research Journal, 2016, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 20.
9. Kosach A. S. Printsip nedopustimosti proizvol’nogo vmeshatel’stva v chastnye dela v rossiiskom grazhdanskom prave. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk [The Principle of the Inadmissibility of Arbitrary Interference in Private Affairs in Russian Civil Law. Ext. Abstr. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Krasnodar, 2007. 22 p.
10. Kuznetsova O. A. Spetsializirovannye normy rossiiskogo grazhdanskogo prava: teoreticheskie problem. Avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk [Specialized Norms of Russian Civil Law: Theoretical Problems. Ext. Abstr. Dr. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Yekaterinburg, 2007. 43 p.
11. Luk’yanenko M. F. Otsenochnye ponyatiya grazhdanskogo prava: teoretiko-pravovoi analiz i praktika pravoprimeneniya. Avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk [Evaluation Concepts of Civil Law: Theoretical and Legal Analysis and Law Enforcement Practice. Ext. Abstr. Dr. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, 2010. 53 p.
12. Luk’yanenko M. F. Otsenochnye ponyatiya kak instrument sudebnogo regulirovaniya grazhdanskikh pravootnoshenii [Valuation Concepts as a Tool of Judicial Regulation of Civil Relations]. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’ – Legal Policy and Legal Life, 2002, no. 4, pp. 179–184.
13. Sukhanov E. A. (Ed.). Rossiiskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. T. 1: Obshchaya chast’. Veshchnoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe pravo. Intellektual’nye prava. Lichnye neimushchestvennye prava [Russian Civil Law. Vol. 1: The General Part. Property Law. Inheritance Law. Intellectual Rights. Personal Non-Property Rights]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2014. 961 p.
14. Sabitova E. N. Mekhanizm zashchity detei, okazavshikhsya v trudnoi zhiznennoi situatsii: postanovka problemy [Protection mechanIsm for Children in Difficult Situations: Problem Statement]. Sed’moi permskii kongress uchenykh-yuristov – Seventh Perm Congress of Legal Scholars. Perm, 2016, pp. 195–196.
15. Strauning E. L. Samozashchita grazhdanskikh prav. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Self-Defense of Civil Rights. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, 1999. 168 p.
16. Fetisov O. E. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v prave: problemy teorii i praktiki. Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Valuation Concepts in Law: Problems of Theory and Practice. Ext. Abstr. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Tambov, 2009. 23 p.
Review
For citations:
Ryzhenkov A.Ya. The Principle of the Inadmissibility of Arbitrary Interference in Family Affairs. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(2):181-188. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-181-188
Views:
1147
Email this article 