The Concept and Mechanism of the Application of Super-Imperative Rules of Private International Law
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-175-180
Abstract
In international private law one of the basic principles is the principle of international politeness, the normative consolidation of which is provided by such an independent institution as direct action norms that have become more widely used in the doctrine as “super-imperative norms”, designed in strictly defined cases to block action as conflict norms of national legislation and the principle of autonomy of the will of the parties. So far, neither in the doctrine, nor in law enforcement activity there is a single understanding of the legal nature of super-imperative norms, which predetermines the relevance of the topic of a scientific article chosen by the Author, in which an attempt is made to identify the essential distinctive features of this type of norms.
About the Author
М. A. Al'kova
Saratov State Law Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Al'kova Marina A., Senior Lecturer of the Department of International Law, Candidate of Legal Sciences
1 Volskaya st., Saratov, 410056
References
1. Zasemkova O. F. O kvalifikatsii polozhenii, napravlennykh na zashchitu slaboi storony dogovora, v kachestve sverkhimperativnykh norm [The Problem of the Qualification of the Weaker Party`s Protective Rules as the Super-Imperative Rules]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo – Public International and Private International Law, 2015, no. 4, pp. 17–21.
2. Zasemkova O. F. Sverkhimperativnye normy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: ponyatie, priznaki, praktika primeneniya. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Super-Imperative Rules of Private International Law: Concept, Features, Practice. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, 2017. 250 p.
3. Kanashevskiy V. A. Opredelenie primenimogo prava k dogovoru mezhdunarodnoi vozdushnoi perevozki passazhirov v rossiiskoi sudebnoi praktike [Definition of the Applicable Law to the Treaty on International Passenger Air Service in Russian Judicial Practice]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 10, pp. 99–110.
4. Krasikov D. V. Doktrina mezhdunarodnoi vezhlivosti: publichnyi poryadok v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave (podkhod sudov SShA i Avstralii). (Obzor) [The Doctrine of International Courtesy: Public Policy in Private International Law (the Approach of the Courts of the United States and Australia). (An Overview)]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 4: Gosudarstvo i pravo – Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 4: State and Law, 2018, no. 2, pp. 167–175.
5. Lebedev S. N., Kabatova E. V. (Eds.). Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. T. 1. [International Private Law. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2011. 208 p.
6. Novikova O. V. Kontseptual’nye osnovy ogovorok o publichnom poryadke i normakh neposredstvennogo primeneniya v angliiskom prave [The Conceptual Basis of Reservations About Public Policy and the Rules of Direct Application in English Law]. Zakon – Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 67–77.
7. Sinitsyn S. A. Zashchita interesov slaboi storony dogovora: isklyuchenie iz printsipa otnositel’nosti dogovornykh obyazatel’stv kak proyavlenie tendentsii sotsializatsii v razvitii sovremennogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel’stva? [Defence of Interests of the Weaker Party of the Contract: Exception from the Principle of Relativity of Contractual Obligations as Manifestation of the Trend of Socialization in the Development of Modern Civil Legislation?]. Advokat – Advocate, 2015, no. 10, pp. 14–21.
8. Tolstykh V. L. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: kollizionnoe regulirovanie [Private International Law: Conflict of Laws Regulation]. St. Petersburg, Yurid. tsentr «Press» Publ., 2004. 526 p.
9. Sanfilippo Ch. Kurs rimskogo chastnogo prava [The Course of Roman Private Law]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2007. 464 p.
10. Shulakov A. A. Publichnyi poryadok v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave i problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya sverkhimperativnykh i imperativnykh norm [Public Policy in Private International Law and Problems of Interpretation and Application of the Super Mandatory and Mandatory Provisions]. Lex Russica, 2018, no. 4, pp. 81–97.
11. Laura Maria van Bochove. Overriding Mandatory Rules as a Vehicle for Weaker Party Protection in European Private International Law. Erasmus Law Review, 2014, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 147–148. DOI: 10.5553/ELR.000030.
Review
For citations:
Al'kova М.A. The Concept and Mechanism of the Application of Super-Imperative Rules of Private International Law. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(2):175-180. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-175-180
Views:
494
Email this article 