Ending the Discussion on the Understanding of the Administrative Process

A discussion that has been going on for decades in the Russian legal doctrine about the understanding of the administrative process, according to one of its most active participants, Professor Yu. N. Starilov – a supporter of the judicial interpretation of the administrative process, has lost its meaning today and only hinders the adoption of overdue legal decisions. From the point of view of the named specialist, the legislator must put an end to this discussion by forcing legal scholars and practitioners to use the “correct” terms. In this regard, as the purpose of the presented research the Author has chosen to clarify the issue of the existence of legal grounds for a clear and unambiguous understanding of the administrative process, to determine the content of this legal concept. The subject of the research is legal norms and judicial acts, which use “administrative-procedural” terminology. The hypothesis of the research is that at present there are necessary and sufficient legal grounds to complete the discussion in the legal doctrine on the understanding of the administrative process. To prove the hypothesis and formulate the conclusions of the study, dialectical, formal-logical, formal-legal, comparative legal methods of cognition, the method of interpreting law, and analysis of materials of judicial practice are used. The study makes it possible to conclude that the current domestic legislation provides for the necessary and sufficient legal basis for understanding the Russian administrative process as a legal concept, meaningfully consisting of three parts: a) administrative judicial proceedings; b) proceedings on cases of administrative offenses; c) administrative process (administrative procedures). Hence, the scientific discussion about the understanding of the Russian administrative process, first of all, about the content of this legal concept, should be considered complete in the Author’s opinion. As one of the results of the study, the Author also notes the dualistic nature of the administrative process, given to it by Russian legislation and expressed in the existence of administrative judicial proceedings (carried out by a court) and an administrative out-of-court process (carried out by the public administration). This circumstance must certainly be taken into account when developing future administrative procedural legislative decisions. At the same time, the doctrinal recognition of the status of administrative procedural for the relevant activities of the public administration, to a much greater extent than the qualification of such activities as administrative and procedural, advocated by the followers of the judicial concept of administrative process, will contribute to the implementation of the idea of protection in the federal law on administrative proceedings (administrative procedures) being drafted of human and civil rights in relations with public administration and, in general, ensuring an appropriate level of proceduralization of administrative activities that meets the standards of a legal state.

1. Bel’skii K. S. Phenomenology of Administrative Law. Smolensk: Smolensk Humanitarian University Publ.; 1995. 144 p. (In Russ.).

2. Starilov Yu. N. “Administrative” and “Judicial” Concepts of the Administrative Process: Development, Modern Meaning and Interaction. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2006;1:110-141. (In Russ.).

3. Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Process: “Administrative Forgery for the Sake of Ease of Administrative Actions” or a Way to Increase Judicial Control over the Administration? Police Law. 2006;4:5-23. (In Russ.).

4. Starilov Yu. N. About Two Main Ways of Modern Development of Russian Administrative and Administrative Procedural Legislation (Thesis). Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2014;3:6-10. (In Russ.).

5. Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Procedures, Administrative Proceedings, Administrative-Tort Law: Three Main Directions of Modernization of Russian Legislation. In: Public Law Yearbook 2015: Administrative Process. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2015. P. 299–330. (In Russ.).

6. Starilov Yu. N. Establishment of Administrative Proceedings in the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences as a Special Form of Implementation of the Constitutional Legal Norm and as the Main Result of the Modernization of Administrative Procedural Legislation. In: Solovey Yu. P. (Ed.). Actual Problems of Administrative Proceedings. Omsk: Omsk Law Academy Publ.; 2015. P. 224–249. (In Russ.).

7. Davydov K. V. Administrative Procedures: Russian and Foreign Experience. Novosibirsk: Akademizdat Publ.; 2020. 516 p. (In Russ.).

8. Starilov Yu. N. Are Not There Many Administrative Processes, or Administrative Legal Proceedings – the Only Type of Modern Russian Administrative Process. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2021;2:287-293. https://doi.org/10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2021.2/3482 (In Russ.).

9. Starilov Yu. N. The Necessary of Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Development of Administrative and Administrative Processual Legislation. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2016;2:9-17. (In Russ.).

10. Starilov Yu. N. The Concept of the New Code of the Russian Federation About Administrative Offenses and the “Fate” of Administrative-Tort Law: Two Newest Issues in Modern Legal Theory. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2020;2:14-41. https://doi.org/10.17308/vsu.proc.law.2020.2/2841 (In Russ.).

11. Serkov P. P. Administrative Procedure as a Mirror of Administrative Science. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2014;9:29- 34. (In Russ.).

12. Serkov P. P. Administrative Proceedings and Administrative Process. In: Solovey Yu. P. (Ed.). Actual Problems of the Administrative Proceedings. Omsk: Omsk Law Academy Publ.; 2015. P. 169–180. (In Russ.).

13. Pudelka J. The Law of Administrative Procedures and Administrative Procedural Law in the States of Central Asia − a Brief Overview of the Current State. In: Public Law Yearbook 2015: Administrative Process. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2015. P. 39–67. (In Russ.).

14. Kori-Perkone K. Administrative Process in Institutions and Courts in Latvia. In: Public Law Yearbook 2015: Administrative Process. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2015. P. 153–171. (In Russ.).

15. Kononov P. I. On Constitutional Law Bases of Understanding the Essence and Structure of Administrative Procedure, Administrative Proceedings and Administrative Procedure Laws in the Russian Federation. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2019;9:9-14. (In Russ.).

16. Starilov Yu. N. To Discussion About the Code of Administrative Proceedings of Russian Federation. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law. 2017;2:19-44. (In Russ.).

17. Ukhov V. Yu., Kaplunov A. I., Avrutin Yu. E. Actual Problems of Administrative and Administrative Procedural Law. State and Law. 2015;11:101-111. (In Russ.).

18. Starilov Yu. N. Discussion About Administrative Proceedings and the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation: 2020. Journal of the Administrative Proceedings. 2020;3:5-23. (In Russ.).

19. Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Law: Nature, Problems of the Reform and a New System. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie. 2000;5:3-4. (In Russ.).

20. Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Law of Russia: Preferential Directions of Reform from the Position of the Doctrine of the Rule of Law. Constitutional Law: Eastern European Review. 2003;1:168-177. (In Russ.).

21. Starilov Yu. N. Russian Administrative Law: Material and Procedural Correlation. Russian Juridical Journal. 2003;1:53- 58. (In Russ.).

22. Starilov Yu. N. Substantive and Procedural Norms of Administrative Law in the Conditions of the Formation of the Rule of Law. Russian Juridical Journal. 2003;3:17-26. (In Russ.).

23. Starilov Yu. N. Russian Administrative Proceedings: On the Basis of Constitutional and Legal Legislation to a Full-Fledged Administrative Procedural Legislation. In: Yearbook of Public Law 2017: Discretion and Value Concepts in Administrative Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2017. P. 397–429. (In Russ.).

24. Starilov Yu. N. Modernization of Administrative and Procedural Legislation: The Main Tasks and Main Directions of Legislative Activity. Juridical Techniques. 2015;9:62-75. (In Russ.).

25. Starilov Yu. N. Modernization of Administrative Offences Legislation: Background, Opportunities and Prospects. Legal Order: History, Theory, Practice. 2015;1:20-28. (In Russ.).

26. Reforming the Code of Administrative Offences: What It Will Be Like? Zakon. 2019;7:17-28. (In Russ.).

27. Solovey Yu. P. Once Again About The Need To Reform The Legislationon Administrative Responsibility. Siberian Law Review. 2019;16(4):442-453. https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2019-16-4-442-453 (In Russ.).

28. Starilov Yu. N. Has the Public Administration Renaissance Epoch Really Begun in Russia? On the Anniversary of Professor L. L. Popov. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2020;7:25-37. https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2020-7-25-37 (In Russ.).

29. Salishcheva N. G. Selected Works. Moscow: RAP Publ.; 2011. 568 p. (In Russ.).