Preview

Siberian Law Review

Advanced search

An Old Problem in Draft of the New Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences

https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-3-411-420

Abstract

The article analyzes the provisions of the draft of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, developed on the basis of the Concept approved in 2019 by the Russian Government. Attention is drawn to the fact that the Concept, for the first time in domestic practice, contains a provision stating that improving the institution of administrative responsibility will require work to transform it from a predominantly punitive-fiscal instrument into the institution of sentencing, subject to differentiated application taking into account the risk-based approach. Based on the analysis of particular compositions of the draft of the Code of Administrative Offenses, it has been concluded that the punitive-fiscal orientation in it remains. Suggestions have been made on possible ways to overcome this. Administrative penalties should only provide general and specific prevention. The economy of administrative repression should become an element of the administrative policy of the executive branch. After the entry into force of the new Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses, it has been proposed to conduct annual monitoring of its application, which will make it possible to identify the compositions that bring the greatest income to the budget. The problem of the existence of a profitable business on administrative responsibility is outlined. Attempts to introduce public-private partnership related to the provision of police assistance are assessed negatively. Based on Russian realities, it can be assumed that in practice this will lead to abuse by police officers and, as a result, to violation of human and civil rights and freedoms. Only in the future, the Russian police should gradually transform from a purely security structure focused on the use of state coercion measures into a structure that is largely service, providing citizens with specific services, in particular, providing them with police assistance when necessary. The idea is supported to recognize the “right to error” and “the right to forgiveness” for an administrative offender. It is proposed to implement it by expanding the possibilities of applying a warning as an alternative to such a punishment as an administrative fine, as well as by expanding the list of possible grounds for exemption from administrative liability. It is concluded that the adoption of the draft of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses does not look obvious.

About the Author

Aleksei A. Grishkovets
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Perm Institute of FPS of Russia
Russian Federation

Grishkovets Aleksei A., Lead Researcher of the Sector of Administrative Law and Administrative Process, Professor of the Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor

10 Znamenka st., Moscow, 119019



References

1. Bel’skii K. S. Politseiskoe pravo [Police Law]. Moscow, Delo i servis Publ., 2004. 816 p.

2. Dugenets A. S. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ v rossiiskom prave. Avtoref. dis. d-ra yurid. nauk [Administrative Responsibility in Russian Law. Ext. Abstr. Dr. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 2005. 34 p.

3. Remnev V. I. Aktual’nye voprosy administrativnoi deliktologii v sovremennyi period [Actual Issues of Administrative Tortology in the Modern Period]. Aktual’nye problemy administrativnoi delktologii – Actual Problems of Administrative Tortology. Kyiv, 1984, pp. 3–16.

4. Kirin A. V., Pligin V. N., Agisheva A. G. Reforma administrativnoi otvetstvennosti v Rossii [Reform of Administrative Responsibility in Russia]. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2018. 477 p.

5. Ryuden E. Yu., Astapenko P. N., Derbicheva S. A. Administrativnaya modernizatsiya politseiskoi sluzhby: strategiya i metodologiya (praktika Federativnoi Respubliki Germanii i Rossiiskoi Federatsii v sravnitel’nom analize) [Administrative Modernization of the Police Service: Strategy and Methodology (the Practice of the Federal Republic of Germany and Russian Federation in a Comparative Analysis)]. Moscow, 2011. 236 p.

6. Sokolov A. Yu. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Administrative Responsibility in Russian Federation]. Saratov, Saratov State Law Academy Publ., 2013. 164 p.

7. Shergin A. P. Administrativnaya politika v pravovom gosudarstve. Administrativnoe pravo i administrativnyi protsess: starye i novye problemy (Po materialam «Lazarevskikh chtenii») [Administrative Policy in a State Governed By the Rule of Law. Administrative Law and Administrative Process: Old and New Problems (Based On the Materials of “Lazarev’s Readings”)]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 1998, no. 8, pp. 5–32.

8. Shergin A. P. Tendentsii sovremennoi administrativnoi politiki [Trends in Modern Administrative Policy]. Administrativnodeliktnoe pravo i zakonodatel’stvo (Stat’i, vystupleniya, razmyshleniya) – Administrative Tort Law and Legislation (Articles, Speeches, Reflections). Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Publ., 2015, pp. 191.

9. Hennette-Vauchez S., Roman D. Droits de l’Homme et libertes fondamentales. Paris, Delloz Publ., 2013. 870 p.


Review

For citations:


Grishkovets A.A. An Old Problem in Draft of the New Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(3):411-420. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-3-411-420

Views: 331


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)