Criminal Procedural Succession of the Rights of the Deceased Participant of Criminal Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-140-147
Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of the points of view available in the legal literature regarding a legal phenomenon related to the actual preservation of personal non-property rights of deceased participants in legal relations, which are subject to posthumous protection in criminal proceedings. The most significant of the approaches are determined. Based on a study of the norms of civil, civil procedure, criminal procedure legislation, and also taking into account the position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, it is concluded that the state delegates the powers to protect certain intangible benefits of a deceased participant in criminal proceedings to his close relatives and other persons within the framework of the succession institution. The author's vision of the criminal procedural succession of rights is proposed, which explains the purpose of participation in the criminal proceedings of the corresponding category of persons. The content of their powers is determined.
About the Author
A. A. Patrusheva
Omsk Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Patrusheva Alena A., Post-graduate student of the Department of Criminal Procedure.
7 Komarova pr., Omsk, 644092 �овна
References
1. Ababkov A.V. Protsessual’noe polozhenie poterpevshego v ugolovnom protsesse. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [The Procedural Situation of the Victim in Criminal Proceedings. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, 1998. 191 p.
2. Belov V. A. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti [Civil Law. General and Special Parts]. Moscow, Tsentr YurInfoR Publ., 2003. 960 p.
3. Bogdanov E. V. Problema sokhraneniya («perezhivaniya») prav i obyazannostei umershego grazhdanina [Problem of Preservation (“Leaving After Life”) of Rights and Obligations of the Deceased Citizen]. Advokat – Advocate, 2015, no. 8, pp. 27–31.
4. Varpakhovskaya E. M. Kompensatsiya moral’nogo vreda poterpevshemu v rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Compensation for Moral Harm to the Victim in the Russian Criminal Process. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Irkutsk, 2002. 203 p.
5. Gavrilov E. V. Dobraya pamyat’ ob umershem cheloveke kak nematerial’noe blago v grazhdanskom prave Rossiiskoi Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stran [The Good Memory of a Deceased Person as an Intangible Good in the Civil Law of the Russian Federation and Foreign Countries]. Grazhdanin i pravo – Citizen and Law, 2014, no. 9, pp. 39–47.
6. Gavrilov M. A. Institut protsessual’nogo pravopreemstva v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [Institute of Procedural Succession in Criminal Proceedings]. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya – Russian Justitia, 2018, no. 11, pp. 49–52.
7. Gukasyan R. E. Pravovaya okhrana pamyati ob umershikh i predmet sudebnoi zashchity [Legal Protection of the Memory of the Dead and the Subject of Judicial Protection]. Pravovedenie, 1973, no. 1, pp. 61–66.
8. Dobrovol’skaya G. Sud’ba del chastnogo obvineniya v svyazi so smert’yu poterpevshego [The Fate of Private Prosecution in Connection with the Death of the Victim]. Sotsial’naya zakonnost’ – Social Legality, 1947, no. 8, pp. 8–9.
9. Ioffe O. S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. Iz istorii tsivilisticheskoi mysli. Grazhdanskoe pravootnoshenie. Kritika teorii «khozyaistvennogo prava» [Selected Works on Civil Law. From the History of Civil-Legal Thought. Civil Relationship. Criticism of the Theory of “Economic Law”]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2000. 777 p.
10. Larina L. Yu. Problemy ugolovno-protsessual’nogo pravopreemstva v sluchae smerti poterpevshego [Problems of Criminal Procedural Succession in the Event of the Death of the Victim]. Aktual’nye voprosy konstitutsionno-pravovogo regulirovaniya modernizatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva (k 20-letiyu Konstitutsii RF) – Actual Issues of Constitutional Regulation of the Modernization of Russian Society (on the 20th Anniversary of the Constitution of the Russian Federation). Ryazan, 2013, pp. 128–132.
11. Maleina M. N. Ponyatie i vidy nematerial’nykh blag kak ob”ektov lichnykh neimushchestvennykh prav [Defenitions and Types of Intangible Benefits as Objects of Personal Non-Property Rights]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 2014, no. 7, pp. 40–47.
12. Mel’nikov S. A. Predstavitel’stvo v sovremennom rossiiskom ugolovnom protsesse. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Representation in the Modern Russian Criminal Trial. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Izhevsk, 2002. 200 p.
13. Meshcheryakova Yu. O. Proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu v otnoshenii umershego. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Criminal Proceedings Against the Deceased. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Samara, 2018. 217 p.
14. Cherepakhin B. B. Pravopreemstvo po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Succession to Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat Publ., 1962. 162 p.
15. Shipunova O. V. Obespechenie prav umershego poterpevshego na dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnomu delu [Providing the Rights of the Died Victim on Pre-Judicial Criminal Proceeding]. Rassledovanie prestuplenii: problemy i puti ikh resheniya – Criminal Investigation: Problems and Ways of Their Solution, 2017, no. 2 (16), pp. 134–140.
Review
For citations:
Patrusheva A.A. Criminal Procedural Succession of the Rights of the Deceased Participant of Criminal Proceedings. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(1):140-147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-140-147
Views:
335
Email this article 