Relationship of Concepts “Administrative Punishment” and “Administrative Responsibility”
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-93-99
Abstract
The article discusses the development of a new scientific field – administrative penology, the subject of research of which is aimed at seeking to increase the efficiency of the appointment and execution of administrative punishment.
The completeness of the study of the subject of administrative penology is directly related to the study of the concept of administrative responsibility. The relevance of comparing the two legal categories of administrative punishment and administrative responsibility is associated with the need to develop the missing legally relevant concepts with understanding nature of administrative punishment. The question is, why the legislator did not consider it possible in the legal definition of an administrative offense, instead of administrative responsibility, to establish a more specific and understandable sign – administrative punishment.
In the final part of the work, it is noted that administrative responsibility and administrative punishment are concepts of one legal nature arising from an administrative offense, where the first concept is a general category, and the second concept is its derivative.
About the Authors
A. N. Deryuga
Far Eastern Branch of the Russian State University of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Deryuga Artem N., Head of the Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Docent.
49 Vostochnoye hwy, Khabarovsk, 680014
S. N. Shaklein
Far Eastern Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shaklein Sergei N., Adjunct of the Department of Administrative Law and Administrative and Service Activities of Internal Affairs Bodies
15 Kazarmenny Lane, Khabarovsk, 680020
References
1. Bel’skii K. S. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’: genezis, osnovnye priznaki, struktura [Administrative Responsibility: Genesis, Main Features, Structure]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 1999, no. 12, pp. 12–20.
2. Solovey Yu. P. Panov A. B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ yuridicheskikh lits [Administrative Liability of Legal Entities]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 2014, no. 5, pp. 119–121.
3. Solovey Yu. P. K voprosu o reforme zakonodatel’nykh osnov administrativnoi otvetstvennosti [On the Issue of Reform of the Legislative Basis of Administrative Responsibility]. Zakonodatel’stvo ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: sovremennoe sostoyanie i puti sovershenstvovaniya – Legislation on Administrative Violations: the Current State and Ways of Improvement. Tula, Akvarius Publ., 2014, pp. 28–39.
4. Solovey Yu. P. Rossiiskoe zakonodatel’stvo ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti nuzhdaetsya v sovershenstvovanii [Russian Law on Administrative Responsibility Is In Need of Improvement]. Vestnik Universiteta im. O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA) – Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL), 2014, no. 2, pp. 56–63.
Review
For citations:
Deryuga A.N., Shaklein S.N. Relationship of Concepts “Administrative Punishment” and “Administrative Responsibility”. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(1):93-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-93-99
Views:
3142
Email this article 