Functions of Digital Information and Technologies in Criminal Proceedings
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-75-82
Abstract
The researcher analyze the functions of digital information and technologies that they carry out in the modern criminal process in different countries of the world. Thereby author investigates the essence of digital phenomena and their importance in the further development of criminal procedure legislation. The author identifies three functions implemented by digital information and technologies in criminal proceedings: communicative, evidential and intellectual. As part of the study of the communicative function, the author proposes a classification of countries by the level of implementation of electronic document management in criminal proceedings. The article also describes the features of the implementation of these functions in different countries of the world, along with the problems associated with the use of digital technologies in the criminal process of Russia, as well as ways to resolve them.
About the Author
A. I. Zazulin
“Intellect-S” firm
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zazulin Anatolii I., Senior Lawyer of law firm “Intellect-S”, Candidate of Legal Sciences.
15 Pervomayskaya st., Yekaterinburg, 620075
References
1. Buryka D. A., Egorova E. V., Merkulova M. V. Pravovye i takticheskie osobennosti proizvodstva otdel’nykh sledstvennykh deistvii [Legal and Tactical Features of the Production of Individual Investigative Actions]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2015. 352 p.
2. Bukharev A. V. Obespechenie otkrytosti i prozrachnosti deyatel’nosti sudebnoi sistemy na sovremennom etape sudebnoi reformy [Ensuring Openness and Transparency of the Judicial System at the Present Stage of the Judicial Reform]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni N. A. Nekrasova – Vestnik of Nekrasov Kostroma State University, 2015, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 207–210.
3. Golovnenkov P., Spitsa N. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyi kodeks Federativnoi respubliki Germaniya – Strafprozessordnung (StPO). Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii i perevod teksta zakona [The Code of Criminal Procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany – Strafprozessordnung (StPO). Scientific and Practical Commentary and Translation of the Text of the Law]. Potsdam, Potsdam University Publ., 2012. 405 p.
4. Efimov O. N. Funktsii yavleniya kak nauchnaya problema [Functions of phenomenon as a scientific problem]. Diskussiya – Discussion, 2014, no. 11 (52), pp. 47–50.
5. Zazulin A. I. Normativnoe obespechenie elektronnogo dokumentooborota v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: opyt FRG [Legal Regulation of Electronic Documentation in Criminal Procedure: German Experience]. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika – Legal Order: History, Theory, Practice, 2018, no. 4 (19), pp. 76–80.
6. Kartskhiia A. A. Tsifrovaya revolyutsiya: novye tekhnologii i novaya real’nost’ [The Digital Revolution: New Technologies and the New Reality]. Pravovaya informatika, 2017, no. 1, pp. 13–18.
7. Kostenko K. A. Problemy teorii i praktiki protivodeistviya zatyagivaniyu oznakomleniya s materialami ugolovnogo dela putem priglasheniya obvinyaemym novogo zashchitnika [Problems of Theory and Practice of Counter-Delaying of Familiarization with Criminal Case Materials by Way of Invitation by the Accused Person of a New Defender]. Rossiiskii sud’ya – Russian Judge, 2016, no. 9, pp. 30–34.
8. Kostenko R. V. Problemnye voprosy opredeleniya sushchnosti, ponyatiya i elementov protsessa dokazyvaniya po ugolovnym delam [Problematic Questions of the Determination of Essence, Conception and Elements of the Proof Process in Criminal Cases]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal – Criminalist’s Library. Scientific Journal, 2011, no. 1, pp. 81–89.
9. Moisievskaya A. K. Realizatsiya antikorruptsionnoi politiki v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii ekonomiki i obshchestva [Implementation of Anti-Corruption Policy in the Context of Digitalization of Economics and Society]. Nauchnye zapiski molodykh issledovatelei – Scientific notes of young scientists, 2018, no. 3, pp. 62–68.
10. Morkhat P. M. Iskusstvennyi intellekt: pravovoi vzglyad [Artificial Intelligence: a Legal View]. Moscow, 2017. 257 p.
11. Segal O. A. Problemy realizatsii glasnosti v ugolovnom protsesse RF. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Problems of the Implementation of Publicity in the Criminal Process of the Russian Federation. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Izhevsk, 2004. 198 p.
12. Seynaroev A. B. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v realizatsii antikorruptsionnykh praktik na regional’nom urovne [Information Technology in the Implementation of Anti-Corruption Practices at the Regional Level]. Vestnik ekspertnogo soveta – Bulletin of the Expert Council, 2015. № 3 (3). S. 123–129.
13. Khaitzhanov A., Glazkov A. S. Audiozapis’ (fonogramma) kak dokazatel’stvo v ugolovnom protsesse [Audio Recording (Phonogram) as Evidence in Criminal Proceedings]. Trudy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma «Nadezhnost’i kachestvo» – Proceedings of the International Symposium “Reliability and Quality”, 2011, vol. 1, pp. 221–224.
14. Kholopov A. V. Primenenie tsifrovykh tekhnologii fiksatsii audiovizual’noi informatsii v ugolovnom proizvodstve [The Use of Digital Technologies for Recording Audio-Visual Information in Criminal Proceedings]. St. Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the University of the Office of the Prosecutor of the Russian Federation Publ., 2010. 68 p.
15. Sheifer S. A. Dokazatel’stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya [Evidence and Proving in Criminal Matters: Problems of Theory and Legal Regulation]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., 2009. 240 p.
16. Yakovleva S. A., Krivorotov S. N. Voprosy kvalifitsirovannoi zashchity na etape oznakomleniya obvinyaemogo i ego zashchitnika s materialami ugolovnogo dela [Questions Qualified Defense at the Stage of Familiarization of the Accused and Its Defender with Criminal Case Materials]. Mariiskii yuridicheskii vestnik – Mary Law Vestnik, 2017, no. 1 (20), pp. 61–64.
17. Calo R., Froomkin M. A., Kerr I. Robot Law. Northampton, Edward Eglar Publ., 2016. 402 p.
18. Industrie 4.0 – Rechtliche Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung. Ein Beitrag zum politischen Diskurs. Berlin, IndustrieFörderung GmbHPubl., 2015. Availableat: https://bdi.eu/media/presse/publikationen/information-und-telekommunikation/201511_Industrie-40_Rechtliche-Herausforderungen-der-Digitalisierung.pdf
Review
For citations:
Zazulin A.I. Functions of Digital Information and Technologies in Criminal Proceedings. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(1):75-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-75-82
Views:
393
Email this article 