Preconditions of Criminalization of Rehabilitation of Nazism in the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-57-61
Abstract
The Authors conclude that the establishment of criminal liability for acts under article 3541 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation corresponds to the basic principles of criminalization. The paper notes that the rehabilitation of Nazism has a sufficient degree of public danger, the positive consequences of criminalization exceed the negative, and in Russian society there is a consolidated opinion about the inadmissibility of such actions. The Authors also point to the shortcomings in the legal technique inherent in article 3541 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, namely the mismatch of the title and content; partly the wrong choice of generic and specific object of the crime; the absence of a note limiting the scope of the article, etc., which complicates law enforcement.
About the Authors
P. V. Poshelov
Siberian Law University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Poshelov Pavel V., Junior Researcher of the Department of Postgraduate Studies and Research Work.
12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010
Yu. S. Pestereva
Siberian Law University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pestereva Yuliya S., Docent of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Docent.
12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010
References
1. Andreeva A. V. Sotsial’naya obuslovlennost’ ustanovleniya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za reabilitatsiyu natsizma v RF [Social Conditionality of Establishment of Criminal Liability for Rehabilitation of Nazism in the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2015, no. 8, pp. 112–114.
2. Gribanov E. V., Yablonsky I. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za reabilitatsiyu natsizma: istoriko-pravovye osnovaniya i kharakteristika [Criminal Liability for Rehabilitation of Nazism: Historical and Legal Basis and Characteristics]. Obshchestvo i pravo – Society and Law, 2017, no. 1 (59), pp. 144–149.
3. Kazakov A. V. Fal’sifikatsiya istorii i itogov Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny kak napravlenie destruktivnogo vozdeistviya na soznanie sovremennoi rossiiskoi molodezhi [Perversion of History and Results of the Great Patriotic War as a Trend of Destructive Impact on Young Contemporary Russians]. Vlast’ – The Authority, 2015, no. 5, pp. 8–13.
4. Kudryavtsev V. N. Osnovaniya ugolovno-pravovogo zapreta. Kriminalizatsiya i dekriminalizatsiya [The Grounds of the Criminal Law Prohibition. Criminalization and Decriminalization]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 303 p.
5. Kudryavtsev V. N., Naumov A. V. (Eds.). Kurs rossiiskogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast’ [Course of Russian Criminal Law. A Common Part]. Moscow, Spark Publ., 2001. 767 p.
6. Marchenko S. M. Realizatsiya v vospitatel’nom protsesse v voennykh vuzakh vnutrennikh voisk MVD Rossii analiza sovremennykh tendentsii geroizatsii natsistskikh prestupnikov i ikh posobnikov [Realization in Educational Process in Higher Education Institutions of Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia of the Analysis of Current Trends of Glorification of Nazi Criminals and Their Helpers]. Uchenye zapiski universiteta imeni P. F. Lesgafta, 2015, no. 11 (129), pp. 157–160.
7. Severtsev O. V. Rol’ SMI i interneta v protivodeistvii ekstremizmu i terrorizmu [The Role of the Media and the Internet in Countering Extremism and Terrorism]. Vestnik Instituta kompleksnykh issledovanii aridnykh territorii – Bulletin of the Institute for Integrated Research in Arid Territories, 2016, no. 2 (33), pp. 103–108.
Review
For citations:
Poshelov P.V., Pestereva Yu.S. Preconditions of Criminalization of Rehabilitation of Nazism in the Russian Federation. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(1):57-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-57-61
Views:
653
Email this article 