Court Activity in the Process of Evidence in the Conditions of Compatibility in Civil Court-Production
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-286-293
Abstract
The article gives a brief historical description of the role of the court in the collection of evidence. The arguments in favor of strengthening the role of the court for the recovery of evidence are presented. In particular, the Author substantiates the conclusion that it is necessary to impose on the court the obligation to independently demand evidence in civil proceedings. The Author comes to the conclusion that strengthening the role of the court in the process of proof in civil proceedings are dictated by the requirements due to the many flaws in civil procedural law, the unequal social status of participants in the process, making decisions not in accordance with actual circumstances of the case.
About the Author
A. D. Dzumatov
Sunzhensky District Court of the Republic of Ingushetia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dzumatov An-Magomed D., Assistant to the Chairman
234 Oskanova st., Karabulak, Republic of Ingushetia, 386231
References
1. Balashov A. N. Aktivnaya rol’ suda v realizatsii zadach administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [Active Role of Court in Implementation of the Tasks of Administrative Procedure]. Administrator suda – Court’s Administrator, 2017, no. 2, pp. 33–38.
2. Vas’kovskii E. V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa. T. 1 [The Course of Civil Process. Vol. 1]. Moscow, 1913. 691 p.
3. Alekhina S. A. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo [Civil Proceedings Law]. Moscow, 2005. 580 p.
4. Evdot’eva I. A. Printsip sostyazatel’nosti kak pravovaya garantiya zashchity prav grazhdan na razlichnykh stadiyakh grazhdanskogo protsessa [The Principle of Competitiveness as a Legal Guarantee of Protecting the Rights of Citizens at Various Stages of the Civil Process]. Protsessual’nye sredstva realizatsii konstitutsionnogo prava na sudebnuyu i arbitrazhnuyu zashchitu – Procedural Means for the Implementation of the Constitutional Right to Judicial and Arbitration Protection. Kalinin, 1982, pp. 21–23.
5. Zhuikov V. M. Printsip sostyazatel’nosti v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The Principle of Competition in Civil Proceedings]. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya – Russian Justitia, 2003, no. 6, pp. 24–29.
6. Kostrova N. M. Aktual’nye problemy grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Actual Problems of Civil Proceedings]. Makhachkala, 2009. 196 p.
7. Fokina M. A. (Ed.). Kurs dokazatel’stvennogo prava: Grazhdanskii protsess. Arbitrazhnyi protsess [Course of Evidence: Civil Process. The Arbitration Process]. Moscow, Statut Publ., 2014. 496 s.
8. Maleshin D. Ya. Rol’ suda v protsesse sobiraniya dokazatel’stv: istoriko-pravovoi analiz [The Role of the Court in the Process of Collecting Evidence: Historical and Legal Analysis]. Zakonodatel’stvo – Legislation, 2008, no. 11, pp. 28–33.
9. Mokhov A. A. Kommentarii k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii: nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii (postateinyi) [Commentary on the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation: Doctrinal and Practical Commentary (Itemized)]. Moscow, 2011. 752 p.
10. Nakhova E. A. Predmet dokazyvaniya v tsivilisticheskoi protsessual’noi doktrine i sudebnoi praktike [Circumstance in Proof in Civil Procedural Doctrine and Judicial Practice]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–70.
11. Nefed’ev E. A. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian Civil Proceedings]. Moscow, 1909. 403 p.
12. Olegov M. D. Istina v grazhdanskom protsesse. Dis. kand. yurid. nauk [Truth in a Civil Process. Cand. Legal Sci. Dis.]. Moscow, 1999. 184 p.
13. Ryazanovskii V. A. Edinstvo protsessa [The Unity of the Process]. Harbin, 1924. 57 p.
14. Tkachenko E. V. K voprosu o sub”ektakh dokazyvaniya v sovremennom arbitrazhnom protsesse [On Proof Subjects in Contemporary Arbitral Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 5, pp. 22–26.
15. Treushnikov M. K. Sudebnye dokazatel’stva [Judicial Evidence]. 5th ed. Moscow, 2016. 304 p.
16. Tsechoev V. K. Istoriya suda Rossii [The History of the Court of Russia]. Moscow, 2015. 159 p.
17. Bonner A. T. Tsivilisticheskii protsess sovremennoi Rossii: problemy i perspektivy [The Civilistic Process of Modern Russia: Problems and Prospects]. Moscow, 2017. 206 p.
18. Shakaryan M. S. GPK neobkhodimo peresmotret’ [Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation Must Be Reviewed]. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya – Russian Justitia, 1994, no. 4, pp. 27–30.
19. Yarkov V. V. O sovershenstvovanii grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [On the Improvement of Civil Procedural Legislation]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law, 1992, no. 2, pp. 150–153.
Review
For citations:
Dzumatov A.D. Court Activity in the Process of Evidence in the Conditions of Compatibility in Civil Court-Production. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(2):286-293. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-286-293
Views:
492
Email this article 