Preview

Siberian Law Review

Advanced search

The Remodeling of Modern Legal Systems (An Analysis of the National Legal Systems of the United States of America and Russian Federation)

https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-6-10

Abstract

The Author provides the results of a comparative analysis of two classically differentiated by legal scholars national legal systems – the American and Russian systems. Obviously, the announced legal systems represent two of the main categories of legal systems: common law and Roman law. Considered traditionally as part of common law, the Author investigates distinctive attributes of American federal and state law, proving the fact of integration of significant features of Continental Europe and Anglo-Saxon legal systems. The article also contains an analysis of the legal nature of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and its distinguished place as a precedent (which is the main common law attribute) and source of law in the Russian Federation.

About the Author

D. T. Karamanukyan
Siberian Law University
Russian Federation

Karamanukyan David T., Provost of Siberian Law University, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Docent

12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010



References

1. Guk P. A. Sudebnyi pretsedent: teoriya i praktika [Judicial Precedent: Theory and Practice]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2009. 128 p.

2. Karamanukyan D. T. Vliyanie Evropeiskogo soyuza na konvergentsiyu romano-germanskogo i anlosaksonskogo prava [The Influence of the European Union on the Convergence of Roman-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon Law]. Vestnik Omskogo yuridicheskogo instituta – Vestnik of the Omsk Law Institute, 2012, no. 1 (18), pp. 4–7.

3. Karamanukyan D. T. Pretsedentnoe pravo ESPCh kak sostavnaya chast’ rossiiskoi pravovoi sistemy [Case Law of ECHR as an Intergral Part of the Russian Legal System]. Sovremennye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. T. II – Contemporary Problems of Human and Natural Sciences. Vol. II. Moscow, Institute for Strategic Studies Publ., 2011, pp. 143–147.

4. Karamanukyan D. T. Protsedura obrashcheniya v Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka [The Procedure of Filling a Complaint to the European Court of Human Rights]. Omsk, Omsk Law Academy Publ., 2014. 164 p.

5. Lazarev V. V., Lipen’ S. V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. 4th ed. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2010. 634 p.

6. Marchenko M. N. Pravo Evropeiskogo soyuza. Voprosy istorii i teorii [European Union Law. Questions of Theory and History]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2010. 431 p.

7. Marchenko M. N. Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava [Problems of Theory of State and Law]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2011. 756 p.

8. Pigolkin A. S. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2010. 743 p.

9. Zweigert K., Kötz H. An Introduction to Comparative Law. 3rd ed. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998. 714 p.


Review

For citations:


Karamanukyan D.T. The Remodeling of Modern Legal Systems (An Analysis of the National Legal Systems of the United States of America and Russian Federation). Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-1-6-10

Views: 496


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)