Authorities of Employees of the Inquiry Bodies at the Stage of Excitation of Criminal Case
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-223-229
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of uncertainty in the question of the subjects of a criminal case that primarily relates to the division of inquiry, because the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation allows both verification of crime reports, and making the results of this activity the decisions of division of inquiry. In practice there are cases when accepted the final decision about refusal in excitation of criminal case employees of division of inquiry, including materials about the crimes of the defendants to the investigators. Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation does not contain the term employees of division of inquiry, in that time, their position, rights and duties are very diverse, often preference is given to departmental interests. This practice has developed largely because of the contradictions inside existing criminal procedure legislation and the simultaneous action of many job descriptions and regulations, rules which the employees of division of inquiry often give priority. The article examines these contradictions, and also departmental orders precluding the uniform application of the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in the decision of a question on excitation or refusal in excitation of criminal case.
About the Author
L. A. AleksandrovaRussian Federation
Aleksandrova Lyudmila A., Docent of the Department of Criminal Procedure, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Docent
21 Komsomolskaya st., Yekaterinburg, 620066
References
1. Voskobojnik I. O., Rytkov A. A. Nepolnota ugolovno-protsessual’nogo regulirovaniya i «nedostatki» prokurorskogo nadzora za zakonnost’yu i obosnovannost’yu reshenii ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [The Incompleteness of Criminal Procedure Regulations and “Shortcomings” of Prosecutorial Supervision Over the Legality and Validity of the Decision Not To Institute Criminal Proceedings]. Vestnik Kaliningradskogo filiala Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii – Bulletin of the Kaliningrad branch of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Russia, 2016, no. 1 (43), pp. 17–19.
2. Kabachenko V. Ya. Mify, simvoly, sistemy. Zakony vzaimodeistviya [Myths, Symbols, Systems. The Laws of Interaction]. Moscow, Amrita Publ., 2010. 240 p.
3. Mikhailov D. O. Nekotorye aspekty rassmotreniya sudami del v poryadke st. 125 UPK RF ob obzhalovanii postanovlenii organov doznaniya i sledstviya ob otkaze v vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Some Aspects of Court Consideration of Cases in Accordance with Art. 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on Appeal of Decisions of Bodies of Inquiry and Investigation on Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings]. Krymskie yuridicheskie chteniya. Prestupnost’ i obshchestvo. T. 1 – Crimean Legal Readings. Crime and Society Vol. 1. Simferopol, Arial Publ., 2018, pp. 95–99.
4. Sudnitsyn A. B., Karlov A. L. Organ doznaniya v sisteme organov vnutrennikh del kak sub”ekt prinyatiya resheniya ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela [The Governing Body in the System of Internal Affairs as a Subject To Make a Decision About Refusal in the Excitation of Criminal Case]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii – Bulletin of the Kazan Law Institute of MIA of Russia, 2019, no. 1 (35), pp. 89–95.
5. Talyneva Z. Z. Protsessual’nye aspekty deyatel’nosti organov doznaniya na etape vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Procedural Aspects of the Activities of Bodies of Inquiry at the Stage of Initiating a Criminal Case]. Aktual’nye problemy prava i gosudarstva v XXI veke – Actual Problems of Law and State in the XXI Century, 2018, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 52–55.
6. Balakshin V. S., Kozubenko Yu. V., Proshlyakov A. D. (Eds.). Ugolovnyi protsess [Criminal Procedure]. Moscow, Infotropik Media Publ., 2016. 916 p.
Review
For citations:
Aleksandrova L.A. Authorities of Employees of the Inquiry Bodies at the Stage of Excitation of Criminal Case. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(2):223-229. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-223-229