Preview

Siberian Law Review

Advanced search

The Problems of Establishing Signs of the Objective Side of the Offense Under Article 251 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Air Pollution”, due to the Reference of the Criminal Law

https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-195-209

Abstract

The Author sets the task to help the law enforcer understand the complex array of environmental and sanitary legislation and, based on the analysis of regulatory acts, reveal the concepts used in Art. 251 of the ­Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Examining environmental legislation, he gives examples of violations of the rules for the emission of pollutants into the atmosphere, as well as cases representing violations of the rules for the operation of installations, structures and other objects. In particular, such violations are the release of pollutants: from a stationary source that is not included in the state register of objects that have a negative impact on the environment; substances of I or II hazard class by objects registered with the state as category IV objects; from a stationary source without gas-trapping equipment (as well as a source with idle gas-trapping equipment), which should be equipped with such devices; resulting in excess of category I, II and III facilities (for category III only with respect to radioactive and highly toxic substances) of an emission standard or indicators of temporarily permitted emission of pollutants; substances whose degree of danger to human life and health and to the environment has not been established; at facilities of category I–III during unfavorable weather conditions with violation of relevant measures in force during unfavorable weather conditions; which led to violation by legal entities and entrepreneurs of the conditions for quoting emissions in cities, a list of which is given in the Law on emission quotas. He comes to the conclusion that air pollution is qualified if the illegal exceeding of the maximum permissible concentrations is detected in a residential area or recreational area. “Other changes in the natural properties of air” should include noise, vibration, ionizing radiation, temperature and other physical factors that change the physical properties of atmospheric air.

About the Author

I. V. Popov
Siberian Law University; “Law Firm “Magistr”
Russian Federation

Popov Igor V., Head of the Department of Civil Law at Siberian Law University, Director at “Law Firm “Magistr”, LLC, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Docent

12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010



References

1. Bokuts Ye. Yu. Ponyatie «zagryaznenie vozdukha», ispol’zuemoe v dispozitsii st. 251 UK [The Notion “Air Pollution” Used in Disposition of Article 251 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Zakonnost’ – Zakonnost Journal, 2011, no. 12 (926), pp. 28–32.

2. Bokuts E. Yu. Stat’ya 251 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii («Zagryaznenie atmosfery»): problemy pravoprimenitel’noi praktiki [Article 251 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“Atmospheric Pollution”): Problems of Law Enforcement Practice]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo – Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law, 2014. no. 3, pp. 103–108.

3. Dubovik O. L. Ekologicheskie prestupleniya: kommentarii k glave 26 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Environmental Crimes: Commentary on Chapter 26 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Spark, 1998. 352 p.

4. Zhevlakov E. N. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana okruzhayushchei prirodnoi sredy v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Criminal Legal Protection of the Environment in the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Research Institute for the Promotion of Law and Order Under the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation Publ., 2002.

5. Knyazev A. G., Churakov D. B., Chuchaev A. I. Ekologicheskie prestupleniya [Environmental Crimes]. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2009. 462 p.

6. Lopashenko N. A. Ekologicheskie prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovoi analiz [Environmental Crimes: Criminal and Legal Analysis]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2017. 526 p.

7. Bernaz L. P. Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 10 yanvarya 2002 g. № 7-FZ «Ob okhrane okruzhayushchei sredy» [Scientific and Practical Commentary on the Federal Law of January 10, 2002 No. 7-FZ “On Environmental Protection”]. Moscow, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law Under the Government of the Russian Federation Publ., Kontrakt Publ., 2018. 528 p.

8. Pleshakov A. M. Ekologicheskie prestupleniya. Ponyatie i kvalifikatsiya [Environmental Crimes. Concept and Qualification]. Moscow, Academy of MIA of the Russian Federation Publ., 1994. 135 p.

9. Pushkarev V. G. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana prirody (sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya) [Criminal Legal Protection of Nature (Current Status and Development Prospects)]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2011. 179 p.

10. Timoshenko Yu. A. Konstruirovanie ugolovno-pravovykh norm ob otvetstvennosti za ekologicheskie prestupleniya (teoriya i praktika) [The Construction of Criminal Law on Liability for Environmental Crimes (Theory and Practice)]. Moscow, Yurlitinform Publ., 2020. 384 p.


Review

For citations:


Popov I.V. The Problems of Establishing Signs of the Objective Side of the Offense Under Article 251 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Air Pollution”, due to the Reference of the Criminal Law. Siberian Law Review. 2020;17(2):195-209. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2020-17-2-195-209

Views: 450


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)