On the Contemporary State of Russia’s Criminal-Law Policy
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2026-23-2-360-374
EDN: FMVVHK
Abstract
The article examines problems of criminal-law policy in contemporary Russia. The subject of the study is state policy on countering crime at the present stage. The aim of the study is to reveal the essence of criminal-law policy, to emphasize the importance of a carefully considered approach to combating crime, and to determining which acts should be recognized as criminally punishable. The article is based on a set of research methods, including analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, as well as the formal legal method. The Author points to a state of crisis characterizing the state’s response to contemporary challenges. This is substantiated by the following factors: excessive criminalization; the spread of moral panic in society with regard to certain phenomena and a disproportionate state response to them; an increase in the number of provisions of criminal legislation penalizing propaganda and calls for conduct or phenomena deemed dangerous by the state, together with the expanding practice of applying such provisions; the legislature’s tendency to act on first impulse, without considering the grounds for criminalization; an increase in the number of victimless offences; a legislative and law-enforcement bias toward harsher liability, including increased penalization; the adoption, almost without discussion and within extremely short timeframes, of highly complex bills establishing new elements of criminal offences; the courts’ failure to pay due attention to establishing the subjective element of an offence, which leads to the conviction of persons for acts that, in principle, should not entail any liability; the introduction of fundamental amendments to bills that are unrelated to the original proposals, with a view to circumventing the requirement to provide an explanatory note to the proposed amendments; and the insufficiency of state measures in crime-prevention activity, which is compensated for by imposing on citizens, under threat of criminal liability, a duty to assist in combating crime. The article concludes that the problems identified above require an immediate change in both the legislative and law-enforcement course, and it sets out specific directions for such changes.
About the Author
P. V. PoshelovRussian Federation
Pavel V. Poshelov, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure,Candidate of Legal Sciences
12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010
Competing Interests:
The Author declares no conflict of interest.
References
1. Gilinsky Ya. I. Postmodern Criminology: Neocriminology. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya Publ.; 2021. 137 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23681/619692 (In Russ.)
2. Gravina A. A. Trends of the Development of Criminal Law at the Modern Stage. Journal of Russian Law. 2016;11:95-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/21994 (In Russ.)
3. Karavaeva Yu. S. “Dead” Special Provisions of the Criminal Law as a Criterion of Excessive (Unjustified) Specialization. Pravovedenie. 2022;66(1):69-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2022.104 (In Russ.)
4. Kaufman M. A. Mistakes in Criminal Law Legislation. Journal of Russian Law. 2016;9:92-101. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.12737/21224 (In Russ.)
5. Pudovochkin Yu. E., Babaev M. M. Criminal Policy and Criminal Law in a Strong State. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2023;18(2):131-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.147.2.131-144 (In Russ.)
6. Gilinsky Ya. I. Criminal Policy of Postmodern Society. In: Rakhmanova E. N. (Ed.). Criminal Policy and Law-Enforcement Practice. St. Petersburg: Asterion Publ.; 2022. P. 10–18. (In Russ.)
7. Khomich V. M. Ensuring a Decent Life for People as a Universal Criminological Factor of Criminal Legal Policy in the Security Field. Legal Order: History, Theory, Practice. 2024;3:60-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47475/2311696X-2024-42-3-60-65 (In Russ.)
8. Gilinsky Ya. I. Criminal Policy in Modern Society. In: Gruzdev V. V., Bril’ G. G. (Eds.). Problems of LawEnforcement Activity at the Present Stage. Kostroma: Kostroma State University Publ.; 2022. P. 54–58. (In Russ.)
9. Korobeev A. I. Criminal Policy in Contemporary Russia: Current State and Prospects. Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2016;3:247-250. (In Russ.)
10. Damm I. A. Anti-Crime Policy as a New Paradigm for Interaction Between Society and the State. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024;17(1):12-27. (In Russ.)
11. Lopashenko N. A., Dolotov R. O., Kobzeva E. V., Khutov K. M. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: A Scholarly Draft. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2019. 316 p. (In Russ.)
12. Savelyev I. V. Special Requirements for the Justification of the Initiative on Criminalization and Penalization: Towards the Stabilization of Lawmaking in the Criminal Law Sphere. The Union of Criminalists and Criminologists. 2024;1:26-30. (In Russ.)
13. Lopashenko N. A. Guilty Despite no Fault: a Reconsideration of Fault and Subjective Imputation. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2025;20(9):72-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.178.9.072-083 (In Russ.)
14. Korobeev A. I. Russian Criminal-Law Policy: From Genesis to Crisis. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2019. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Poshelov P.V. On the Contemporary State of Russia’s Criminal-Law Policy. Siberian Law Review. 2026;23(2):360-374. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2026-23-2-360-374. EDN: FMVVHK
JATS XML
































