Administrative Delict Proceedings as a Procedural Form of the National System of Justice

The article advances the idea that proceedings in cases of administrative offences in courts of general jurisdiction form part of a broader procedural phenomenon that encompasses judicial authorisation of measures of administrative coercion for administrative delicts. The author proposes to designate this phenomenon as administrative delict proceedings. At present, this sphere is unjustifiably divided among three competing bodies of rules: the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation, and the Arbitration (Commercial) Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. This situation complicates the administration of justice and creates a need for guiding clarifications for judges. The author proposes a third codification of administrative offence legislation by removing from the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration (Commercial) Procedure Code of the Russian Federation the rules regulating this judicial activity and consolidating them in a standalone federal law “On Administrative Delict Proceedings.” Its subject matter should cover the following types of proceedings in courts of general jurisdiction and commercial courts: (1) cases of administrative offences; (2) resolution of certain procedural issues in administrative offence cases pending before non-judicial bodies; and (3) adoption of certain procedural response measures relating to administrative delicts outside the framework of administrative offence case proceedings. Administrative delict proceedings should be elevated to the status of a type of judicial proceedings within which administrative delict law is implemented, equivalent to the forms of justice enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. This innovation should be built on a specially developed procedural model—an administrative delict procedural form. It should envisage the court’s determination of the truth in the case under conditions of adversarial process and equality of the parties—the administrative prosecution authority and the person subject to administrative prosecution. The procedural model should also provide for an acquittal decision in an administrative offence case. 

1. Salisheva N. G. Administrative procedure in USSR. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1964. 158 p. (In Russ.)

2. Salisheva N. G. Problems of the Legal Regulation of the Institute of Administrative Responsibility in the Russian Federation. Administrative Law and Procedure. 2014;9:9-22. (In Russ.)

3. Kaplunov A. I. On the Procedural Nature and Content of “Administrative” Legal Proceedings. Legal Policy and Legal Life. 2021;3-1:57-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/1608-8794-2021-3-57-65 (In Russ.)

4. Kazikhanova S. S. Are the Relations During the Consideration of Cases by Arbitration Courts Included in the Subject of Civil Procedural Law (in Continuation of One Scientific Discussion). Herald of Civil Procedure. 2022;12(4):313-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2022-12-4-313-340 (In Russ.)

5. Patsatsiya M. Sh. On the Right of a Court of Superior Jurisdiction on Giving Obligitary Instructions About Interpretation of the Law, and Legislative Measures Oriented To Growth of Procedural Guarantees of Independence for a Court Below. Herald of Civil Procedure. 2019;9(3):45-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-3-45-60 (In Russ.)

6. Blazheev V. V. Certain Topical Issues of Further Improving the Arbitration Procedural Form. In: Abova T. A., Zhilin G. A., Kallistratova R. F., Patsatsiya M. Sh., Prikhod’ko I. A., Renov E. N., Tyagai D. E. (Eds.) Problems of Accessibility and Effectiveness of Justice in Commercial and Civil Proceedings. Moscow: Lidzhist Publ.; 2001. P. 172–179. (In Russ.)

7. Fursov D. A. Subject Matter, System, and Fundamental Principles of Arbitration Procedural Law (Issues of Theory and Practice). Moscow: INFRA-M Publ.; 1999. 449 p. (In Russ.)

8. Voskobitova L. A. Legal Proceedings in Administrative Cases and Their Place in the Judiciary System. Magistrate Judge. 2017;2:28-34. (In Russ.)

9. Gros L. A. The CAO RF: Ignoring the Rules of Civil Procedure Law. Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2002;12:14-17. (In Russ.)

10. Zakopyrin V. N., Pavlova L. V. Conceptual Provisions of Two-Tier Administrative Liability in the Draft of a New Administrative Offense Code of the Russian Federation: To Be or Not To Be? Administrative Law and Procedure. 2020;10:38-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2020-10-38-40 (In Russ.)

11. Kosonogova O. V. Consideration of Administrative Offence Cases by Judges of Commercial Courts. Voronezh: Voronezh State University Publ.; 2007. 245 p. (In Russ.)

12. Gonzus I. P. Issues in Applying the New APC RF and the CAO RF. Arbitrazh and Civil Procedure. 2003;7:2-5. (In Russ.)

13. Nazritskaya T. S. Legal and Practical Conditionality of the Prosecutor’s Participation in the Consideration of Administrative Offenses Cases in Commercial Courts. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(2):183-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2021.123.2.183-191 (In Russ.)

14. Kleinman A. F. Issues of Civil Procedure in Light of Judicial Practice. Socialist Legality. 1946;9:11-14. (In Russ.)

15. Kleinman A. F. Toward the Drafting of the USSR Code of Civil Procedure. Socialist Legality. 1946;11- 12:35-37. (In Russ.)

16. Borodin S. V. On Measures of Administrative Influence Imposed by People’s Judges. Soviet Justice. 1958;11:26-30. (In Russ.)

17. Bartykov I. F., Dagel’ P. S., Eliseikin P. F., Kuklin V. A., Nesterov A. I. Administrative Offences Considered in Court Proceedings. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1964. 162 p. (In Russ.)

18. Strogovich M. S. (Ed.). Democratic Foundations of Soviet Socialist Justice. Moscow: Nauka Publ.; 1965. 392 p. (In Russ.)

19. Panova I. V. Administrative Process in the Russian Federation: Concept, Principles and Kinds. Izvestiâ vysših učebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 2000;2:114-127. (In Russ.)

20. Shergin A. P. Administrative Jurisdiction. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1979. 143 p. (In Russ.)

21. Isaenkova O. V. Toward the Drafting of the Enforcement Code of the Russian Federation. Zakonodatelstvo. 2002;1:73-74. (In Russ.)