State Digital Sovereignty in Russian Law
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2026-23-2-192-203
EDN: AMYPPP
Abstract
This study is devoted to the state’s digital sovereignty, which is currently the subject of interdisciplinary scholarly debate. The article argues that no unified approach to the understanding of digital sovereignty has yet emerged in legal scholarship. In this regard, the Author advances the idea that Russian legal literature on digital sovereignty has developed primarily under the influence of technological and software-related challenges, in the context of the principle of technological conditioning. As follows from the ideas of I. L. Bachilo, V. A. Kopylov, P. U. Kuznetsov, and A. B. Vengerov, this principle served as one of the prerequisites for the formation of Russian information law. The article analyzes various Russian approaches to the understanding of digital sovereignty, including those of P. V. Stepanov, V. A. Nikonov, A. A. Streltsov, and others, and identifies their key aspects and advantages. On the basis of this analysis, the study offers a critical reconsideration of the theory of state digital sovereignty. An examination of current legislation reveals gaps in the legal regulation of digital sovereignty, including the absence of its statutory definition. In addition, the article considers the concepts of “digital networks,” “software,” and “digital technologies” in the context of Russian legal reality and identifies, within their content, categories directly related to digital sovereignty under current Russian legislation. The article states that state digital sovereignty has not previously been the subject of public-law dissertation research and that Russian legal scholars have not attempted to model state digital sovereignty through a categorical framework comprising technological sovereignty, digital sovereignty, and state sovereignty. In conclusion, the Author formulates a definition of digital sovereignty and states that this understanding, grounded in public-law aspects, may serve as a basis for the future legal regulation of the concept of “digital sovereignty,” as well as for the construction of a theoretical model of state digital sovereignty.
About the Author
A. S. AgafonovRussian Federation
Andrey S. Agafonov, postgraduate student of the Department of Information Law
21 Komsomolskaya st., Yekaterinburg, 620066
Competing Interests:
The Author declares no conflict of interest.
References
1. Polyakova T. A. Legal Support of National Sovereignty in the Information Space: in the Context of the Digital Transformation of the State. In: Polyakova T. A., Minbaleev A. V., Naumov V. B., Troyan N. A., Smirnov A. A. (Eds.). The Seventh Bachilov Readings. Moscow: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ.; 2024. P. 9–18. (In Russ.)
2. Bachilo I. L., Kopylov V. A. Are There Grounds for Establishing Information Law as a Branch of Law? Information Society. 1999;6:49-50. (In Russ.)
3. Vengerov A. B. Law and Information in the Context of Automated Governance: Theoretical Issues. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1978. 206 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kuznetsov P. U. Methodological Features of the Digital State of Sovereignty. In: Proceedings of the XVIII International Forum “Partnership between the State, Business, and Civil Society in Ensuring International Information Security.” Moscow, 2024. P. 67–70. (In Russ.)
5. Stepanov P. V. Approaches to Understanding Russia’s Digital Sovereignty. Journal of Russian Law. 2024;28(4):37-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61205/jrp.2024.4.1 (In Russ.)
6. Nikonov V. A., Voronov A. S., Sazhina V. A., Volodenkov S. V., Rybakova M. V. Digital Sovereignty of a Modern State: Content and Structural Components (Based On Expert Research). Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2021;60:206-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/18 (In Russ.)
7. Strel’tsov A. A. Digital Sovereignty as a Basis for the Formation of an International Information Security System. In: Proceedings of the XVIII International Forum “Partnership between the State, Business, and Civil Society in Ensuring International Information Security.” Moscow, 2024. P. 44–46. (In Russ.)
8. Petrochenkov I. A. On the Issue of the Concept of Digital Sovereignty. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2022;7:69-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2022-7-69-73 (In Russ.)
9. Romanovsky G. B., Romanovskaya O. V. On Digital Sovereignty. Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2022;9:25-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2022-9-25-31 (In Russ.)
10. Zharova A. K. Ensuring the Information Sovereignty of the Russian Federation. Jurist. 2021;11:28-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2021-11-28-33 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Agafonov A.S. State Digital Sovereignty in Russian Law. Siberian Law Review. 2026;23(2):192-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2026-23-2-192-203. EDN: AMYPPP
JATS XML
































