Shortcomings of the Preliminary Investigation Under the Statute of Criminal Procedure of 1864
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-3-386-404
EDN: KVIKIC
Abstract
A significant body of scholarly literature examines the shortcomings of the preliminary investigation. However, the historical aspects of this problem have not been thoroughly investigated. Currently, there is a lack of papers giving the comprehensive analysis of the shortcomings of preliminary investigation before the revolution. The paper examines the concept and types of shortcomings of the preliminary investigation mentioned in the works of Russian processualists of the second half of the 19th and early 20th century. The Author hypothesizes that by the beginning of the twentieth century, the doctrine prescribed that the shortcomings of the preliminary investigation as a relatively mass phenomenon, the essence of which was a violation of the requirements and procedures of the preliminary investigation. The Author uses historical and legal, statistical methods, a system analysis. The historical and legal methods enabled the Author through the analysis of the provisions of the doctrine, the Statute of Criminal Proceedings of 1864, and the changing judicial practice, to retrospectively trace academic approaches to the shortcomings of preliminary investigation. In addition to the historical and legal methods, the Author uses the method of system analysis. This analysis helps to examine the shortcomings of preliminary investigation in their connection with the main stages and institutions of the pre-revolutionary criminal procedures. The statistical methods helped to reveal the structure and identify the changes in the shortcomings of the preliminary investigation from 1874 to 1914. The Author has come to the following conclusions: the content of the concept of "shortcomings of the preliminary investigation" was revealed through characterizing typical violations committed during the preliminary investigation; such shortcomings of preliminary investigation as major violations committed; non-criminal actions of the court investigator; certain procedural and social consequences. The Author concludes that it is advisable to relate investigation mistakes of present time to the provisions of the pre-revolutionary doctrine. The paper reveals the structure of the shortcomings of preliminary investigation including the incompleteness of the preliminary investigation and its biased character, prolonged proceedings, violations of the forms and procedure of preliminary investigation, incorrect classification of crime. The Author proves that the greatest drawback in the structure of the preliminary investigation was incompleteness of the preliminary investigation. For the period from 1874 to 1914, a tendency of increasing the number of mistakes made at the stage of the preliminary investigation was revealed.
About the Author
N. P. BukharinаRussian Federation
Nadezhda P. Bukharinа, postgraduate student
Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics Law
660041; 79 Svobodny pr.; Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Rozin N. N. On the Reparation of Non-Guilty Persons Proceeded Against Criminally. Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1897;9:81-117. (In Russ.)
2. Boikov A. D. Issues of Strengthening the Rule of Law and Improving the Effectiveness of Criminal Proceedings in the Context of Requirements of the 27<sup>th</sup> CPSU Congress. In: Boikov A. D. (Ed.). Issues of Strengthening the Rule of Law and Eliminating Investigation Mistakes in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow, 1988. P. 9–17. (In Russ.)
3. Solov’ev A. B., Sheifer S. A., Tokareva M. E. Investigation Mistakes and Their Causes. Socialist Legality. 1987;12:46-48. (In Russ.)
4. Badalyan S. A. On Some Shortcomings of the Investigation and Prevention of Criminal Violations of Labor Protection Rules. Investigation Practice. 1975;105:101-108. (In Russ.)
5. Kovrizhnykh B. N. Analysis of the Shortcomings of Preliminary Investigation in Suspended Cases of Unsolved Murders. In: Criminalistics and Forensic Examination. Iss. 1. Kyiv: Lybid’ Publ.; 1964. P. 48–54. (In Russ.)
6. Lysov S. Shortcomings in the Investigation of Crimes and Ways to Eliminate Them. Weekly of Soviet Justice. 1928;25:719-721. (In Russ.)
7. Nazarov A. D. Investigation Mistakes and Judicial Errors, and the Criminal Procedure Mechanism for Their Elimination: Conceptual Framework. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2017. 400 p. (In Russ.)
8. Sheifer S. A. Evidence and Proof in Criminal Cases: Theory and Legal Regulation. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Moscow: Norma Publ., INFRA-M Publ.; 2024. 240 p. (In Russ.)
9. Minnikes I. V. Formation and Development of Legal Regulation of Procedural Relations in Russia from the X to the Beginning of the XX Century: Sources of Law, Periodization. Legal Science and Practice: Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2022;3:18-24. doi: 10.36511/2078-5356-2022-3-18-24 (In Russ.)
10. Adamenko I. E. On the Foundations of the Statute of Criminal Procedure of November 20, 1864. Criminal Justice. 2015;1:20-23. doi: 10.17223/23088451/5/4 (In Russ.)
11. Efremova N. N. The Evolution of the Russian Justice (The Court Reforms of XVIII–XIX Centuries). Law Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2008;2:34-50. (In Russ.)
12. Butskovskii N. A. An Essay of the Cassational Procedure for the Cancellation of Rulings on Judicial Statutes of 1864. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. St. Petersburg: The Printing Office of the Second Department of His Imperial Majesty’s Own Chancellery; 1866. 181 p. (In Russ.)
13. Butskovskii N. A. On the Procuracy Supervision as a Result of Separating Prosecutive Jurisdiction from the Judicial Power. St. Petersburg: The Printing Office of the Second Department of His Imperial Majesty’s Own Chancellery; 1867. 80 p. (In Russ.)
14. Gorodyskii Ya. K. Announcing the Investigative Procedure to the Defendant. Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1899;7:69-82. (In Russ.)
15. Butskovskii N. A. Essays of Judicial Procedures According to the Statutes on November 20, 1864. St. Petersburg: Printing House of Skaryatin, 1874. 616 p. (In Russ.)
16. Nemirovskii E. Ya. The Relation of the Verdict to the Charge: the Criminal and Legal Investigation of Manuil Nemirovsky. Odessa: Ekonomicheskaya Printing House, 1906. 408 p. (In Russ.)
17. Sheifer S. A. The Structure and General Characteristics of Investigation Mistakes. In: Boikov A. D. (Ed.). Issues of Strengthening the Rule of Law and Eliminating Investigation Mistakes in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow, 1988. P. 19–24. (In Russ.)
18. Puchkovskaya M. E. Investigation Mistakes and Ways to Eliminate Them by the Court at Certain Stages of Criminal Proceedings. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University Publ.; 2006. 152 p. (In Russ.)
19. Chebyshev-Dmitriev A. P. Russian Criminal Proceedings Under Judicial Statutes of November 20, 1864. St. Petersburg: V. P. Pechatkin Publ.; 1875. 756 p. (In Russ.)
20. Tomashinskii G. S. Do We Need Protection During Preliminary Investigation? Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1881;11(1):110-121. (In Russ.)
21. Obninskii P. N. The Upcoming Reform in Our Investigation Field as a Means of Eliminating the Shortcomings (Based On the Observations of a Former Prosecutor). Legal Bulletin. 1891;7(1):60-85. (In Russ.)
22. Danevskii V. P. Our Preliminary Investigation, Its Shortcomings and Reform. Moscow: The Highly Approved Partnership of the Printing Press of A. A. Levenson; 1895. 89 p. (In Russ.)
23. Tarnovskii E. N. Acquittals in Russia. Legal Bulletin. 1891;7(3):425-441. (In Russ.)
24. Kharizomentov N. On the Shortcomings of the Investigative Part of the Judicial Statutes on November 20, 1864. Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1881;11(2):87-88. (In Russ.)
25. Gorodyskii Ya. K. On Additions to Completed Preliminary Investigations (an Essay from Investigative Practice). Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1885;15(4):75-142. (In Russ.)
26. Sokolov A. A. Shortcomings in Preliminary Investigation. Legal Bulletin. 1876;1/2:22-66. (In Russ.)
27. Mal’chevskii K. A. On Measures to Eliminate the Main Shortcomings of Investigative Part. Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1880;10(5):38-53. (In Russ.)
28. Foinitskii I. Ya. The Preliminary Investigation and Its Reform. Journal of Civil and Criminal Law. 1882;12(1):123-199. (In Russ.)
29. Sheifer S. A. The Concept, Structure and Causes of Investigation Mistakes. In: Issues of Legal Procedure in Criminal and Criminal Procedure Legislation. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl University Publ.; 1997. P. 141–153. (In Russ.)
30. Gorodyskii Ya. K. Our Courts and Judicial Procedures According to the 1895 Revision (Continued). Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1901;3:1-59. (In Russ.)
31. Vilkova T. Yu., Maslennikova L. N. Legitimacy and Unification in Criminal Proceedings: from Procedural Document Forms to the Electronic Criminal Case. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie Nauki. 2019;46:728-751. doi: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-728-751 (In Russ.)
32. Chebyshev-Dmitriev A. P. The Beginning of Russian Criminal Proceedings Under Judicial Statutes on November 20, 1864. Iss. 1. St. Petersburg: The Printing House of the Governing Senate; 1867. 108 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Bukharinа N.P. Shortcomings of the Preliminary Investigation Under the Statute of Criminal Procedure of 1864. Siberian Law Review. 2024;21(3):386-404. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-3-386-404. EDN: KVIKIC