Criminal Law Significance of Final Procedural Decisions on Exemption from Criminal Liability and Punishment
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-1-63-74
EDN: EXLGQL
Abstract
The subject of the study is the provisions of criminal, criminal procedural and criminal exe cutive legislation, as well as acts of interpretation and judicial practice related to the legal regulation of exemption from criminal liability or punishment of those who have committed a crime. The purpose of the study is to compare the provisions of the criminal law regulating the grounds for exemption from criminal liability and punishment with the norms of criminal procedure law regul ating the procedure for making final decisions on the termination of a criminal case (prosecution). Using the general scientific dialectical method, as well as the methods of formal legal analysis and synthesis, the author identified and demonstrated contradictions between the norms of substantive and procedural law in terms of substantiating the grounds for terminating a criminal case (prosec ution) and the grounds for exemption from criminal liability (punishment). Conclusions. Ignoring the provisions of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which contains an exhaustive list of grounds and conditions for exemption from criminal liability and punishment, results in uncertain legal consequences for those who have committed crimes, both as to criminal law coercive measures and determining the general legal consequences for a person committing a crime. Thus, in some cases, courts are forced to make decisions on exemption from punishment due to the expiry of the statute of limitations, despite the fact that Art. 78 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation requires that such persons be exempted from criminal liability. On the other hand, Art. 398 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation contains a special provision for deferring the execution of a sentence, which is not found in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation either as a basis for exemption from liability or from punishment. It is proposed to eliminate the exis ting contradictions in the branches of law by unifying the norms of criminal procedural legisl ation and bringing them into conformity with the norms of substantive criminal law that regulate the e xemption from criminal liability and punishment.
About the Author
K. N. KarpovRussian Federation
Kirill N. Karpov, doctoral student of the Research Department, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor
7 Komarova pr., Omsk, 644092
References
1. Lavnov M. A. Decision to Close a Criminal Case and Its Legal Features. Journal of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia. 2019;1:121-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25724/VAMVD.GHIJ (In Russ.).
2. Elinsky A. V. Non-Criminal Law Consequences of the Previous Conviction in the Light of the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Journal of Russian Law. 2010;7:78-84. (In Russ.).
3. Arkhengol’ts I. A. Criminal Record and Its Legal Consequences. Kazan: Buk Publ.; 2020. 172 p. (In Russ.).
4. Murav’ev K. V. Improvement of the Procedural Application of the Criminal Law. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2019. 264 p. (In Russ.).
5. Nikolyuk V. V. Modern Criminal Policy and Punitive Practice in Russia: Doctrinal, Organizational and Legal Aspects. In: Activities of Law Enforcement Agencies in Modern Conditions. Vol. 1. Irkutsk: East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Publ.; 2018. P. 243–250. (In Russ.).
6. Pudovochkin Yu. E., Tolkachenko A. A. The Main Directions of Intersectoral Improvement Institute of Exemption From Criminal Liability. Journal of Russian Law. 2020;4:59-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.042 (In Russ.).
7. Pudovochkin Yu. E. General Problems and Errors of Exemption from Criminal Liability (Review of Judicial Practice). Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. 2020;1:85-92. (In Russ.).
8. Artamonov A. N. Termination of a Criminal Case (Criminal Prosecution) on Non-Rehabilitating Grounds. Legislation and Practice. 2015;2:71-78. (In Russ.).
9. Pupysheva L. A. Current Issues of Consideration and Resolution of Problems Related To Execution of Sentences Imposed On Minors. In: Andreeva O. I., Trubnikova T. V. (Eds.). Legal Issues of Strengthening Russian Statehood. Vol. 79. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publ. House; 2018. P. 303–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/9785946217637/36 (In Russ.).
10. Kazarin D. M., Ryabchikov V. V. Rehabilitative and Non-Rehabilitation Grounds for Termination of a Criminal Case and Criminal Prosecution: Current Issues of Law Enforcement Practice. StudNet. 2022;5(2):1220-1226. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Karpov K.N. Criminal Law Significance of Final Procedural Decisions on Exemption from Criminal Liability and Punishment. Siberian Law Review. 2024;21(1):63-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-1-63-74. EDN: EXLGQL