Preview

Siberian Law Review

Advanced search

The Content and Interrelations of the Concepts of Crime Prevention (Prophylaxis and Prevention) by an Investigator

https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-1-107-120

EDN: FIWOFY

Abstract

At the present stage of the development of science, there is no consensus on the relationship between the concepts of “prevention/prophylaxis” and “prevention”/preduprezhdenie (Russian) of crimes, even despite a large number of studies on certain aspects of preventive   activities of the investigator. At present, there are three main approaches to the correlation of the terms under consideration: prophylaxis and prevention as identical notions, preventive/prophylactic activity has a function of prevention, and vice versa, preventive activity acts as a generic concept for the function of prophylaxis. Crime prevention in terms of informing, warning, includes prophylaxis, prevention and suppression of crime.  All these elements are the stages. And prophylaxis is the first stage of preventive activity, as it affects the causes and conditions of illegal, criminally punishable human behavior. Prophylaxis is aimed at eliminating an intent to commit a socially dangerous act by eliminating the causes and conditions that contribute to this. Prevention is aimed at inducing a person who has the intent to commit a crime to refrain from the illegal type of behavior planned by him. The suppression of a crime is aimed at stopping the implementation of a criminal plan, that is, the criminal activity that has already taken place, as well as at minimizing the criminal result. At the same time, all these elements of preventive activity take place at different points in time. However, prophylaxis can be carried out both during the investigation of a specific crime or out of it through the investigator’s talks to employees, schoolchildren, students, through studies containing information about criminal cases. The lack of a unified approach to the ratio of prophylactic and preventive activities is also due to the lack of codification of these notions. Despite the fact that the legislator  focuses on the prophylaxis and prevention of specific types of crimes such as  terrorism, extremism in certain regulatory legal acts, there is still no clear distinction between them. 

About the Authors

I. V. Homenko
Siberian Law University
Russian Federation

Ivan V. Homenko, postgraduate student of the Department of Criminal Law
and Procedure

12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010

   


Yu. V. Derishev
Siberian Law University

Yuri V. Derishev, Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation

12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010



References

1. Politico O. E., Zhizhileva A. A. Problems and Prospects for Improving the Preventive Activities of Preliminary Investigation Bodies. Society, Law, Statehood: Retrospective and Perspective. 2020;1:80-85. (In Russ.).

2. Bogdanov Ya. I. Prevention and Forecasting of Crimes By an Investigator of the Investigative Committee of Russia. Young Scientist. 2022;20:257-259. (In Russ.).

3. Aleksandrov A. N., Rudov D. N. Obliging Activity of Investigator How One of Main Aspect Task of Criminal Legal Proceedings. Vestnik of Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia. 2013;1:33-37. (In Russ.).

4. Novitsky A. A. Crime Prevention in the Russian Federation. Sciff. Questions of Students Science. 2020;11:276279. (In Russ.).

5. Korzhev M. A. he Concept and System of Crime Prevention. Innovation Science. 2015;7-2:76-78. (In Russ.).

6. Malkov V. D. The Prevention of Crime and Other Offences in the System of Combating Crime. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. 2014;22:78-88. (In Russ.).

7. Grishin D. A. Crime Prevention: Differentiating the Terminology Used. Law and Legislation. 2020;7:91-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2073-3313-2020-10328 (In Russ.).

8. Karimov E. T. General and Special Prevention as the Goal of Punishment. Science Vector of Togliatti State University. 2012;3:156-160. (In Russ.).

9. Shuisky A. S. Crime Prevention and Criminal-Law Norms with Double Prevention. Humanities, Social- Economic and Social Sciences. 2018;2:106-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23672/SAE.2018.2.11500 (In Russ.).

10. Fayrushina R. D., Imaeva Ju. B. Concept and Legal Framework of the Preventive Activity of an Investigator. Society, Law, Statehood: Retrospective and Perspective. 2023;1:62-67. (In Russ.).

11. Antonov I. A. Implementation of the Preventive Function of Criminal Procedure Law by an Investigator: Problems of Law Enforcement Practice. Vestnik of Economic Security. 2021;2:107-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2414-3995-2021-2-107-110 (In Russ.).

12.


Review

For citations:


Homenko I.V., Derishev Yu.V. The Content and Interrelations of the Concepts of Crime Prevention (Prophylaxis and Prevention) by an Investigator. Siberian Law Review. 2024;21(1):107-120. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2024-21-1-107-120. EDN: FIWOFY

Views: 364


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)