Some Issues of Terminating a Criminal Case
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-2-199-211
Abstract
This publication continues the experience of covering the work of the Scientific and Methodological Council under the Prosecutor of the Omsk Region, among the main tasks of which remains the development and discussion, together with representatives of legal science, of sound recommendations on problematic issues of prosecutorial supervision, legislation and law enforcement practice, legal advisory opinions on issues arising in prosecutorial practice. In this regard, the article proposes to discuss certain topical problems of law enforcement practice raised at one of the last meetings of the Scientific and Methodological Council under the Prosecutor of the Omsk Region. Thus, based on a systematic analysis of errors in the implementation of the institution of a judicial fine, it is proposed to provide prosecutors with systematic supervision over compliance with the requirements of the law when it is applied, which requires a more thorough study of criminal cases, as well as a proper initiative to establish the circumstances associated with the application of a judicial fine, and timely challenging unfounded court decisions. In addition, the practice of law enforcement highlights the fundamental problem of a unified interpretation of the grounds for terminating a criminal case (criminal prosecution) against a person who has committed an act prohibited by criminal law in a state of insanity. Based on the analysis of legal situations and various approaches to their resolution, the article argues for the need to make a decision on the studied criminal cases on the grounds of paragraph 4 of part 1 of Art. 24 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the death of a person involved in criminal proceedings. In other similar situations, but related to the criminal prosecution of these persons, the decision must be made taking into account the specific circumstances of the criminal case.
About the Authors
Yu. V. DerishevRussian Federation
Yury V. Derishev – Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010
E. I. Chekmezova
Russian Federation
Elena I. Chekmezova – Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010
D. D. Tuleva
Russian Federation
Dinara D. Tuleva – Deputy Chairman of the Scientific and Methodological Council at the Prosecutor’s Office
1 Lenin st., Omsk, 644099
M. V. Kiseleva
Russian Federation
Mariya V. Kiseleva – Senior Prosecutor of the Appellate Division of the Criminal Judicial
1 Lenin st., Omsk, 644099
P. V. Kozlovskiy
Russian Federation
Petr V. Kozlovskiy – Head of the Research Department
7 Komarova pr., Omsk, 644092
References
1. Bagautdinov F. N., Khaydarov A. A. Role and Powers of the Prosecutor in the Mechanism of Implementation of the Provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law on Judicial Fine. Russian Justice. 2018;10:16-19. (In Russ.).
2. Sukhoverkhova E. V., Endoltseva Yu. V. Termination of Criminal Prosecution (Criminal Case) Against Those Who Have Committed Criminal Offense Prohibited in the State of Insanity, and Those Who, After Committing a Crime Becomes Insane, Making It Impossible to Sentencing or Execution. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2013;7:94-101. (In Russ.).
3.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Derishev Yu.V., Chekmezova E.I., Tuleva D.D., Kiseleva M.V., Kozlovskiy P.V. Some Issues of Terminating a Criminal Case. Siberian Law Review. 2022;19(2):199-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-2-199-211