Administrative-Legal Issues of the Movement of Detained Vehicles To a Specialized Parking Lot and Their Storage

The subject of the study is the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses, which establish the powers of the subjects of the Russian Federation to determine the procedure for moving detained vehicles to a specialized parking lot and storing them. The object of the study is public relations related to the organization of the activities of service providers for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, as well as the selection of these service providers. Within the framework of the article, the Author presents an analysis of federal and regional legislation in terms of the implementation of powers by public legal entities in this area of relations. The problems of the implementation of federal legislation, as well as the main approaches, similarities and differences of the "advanced" legal regulation of the relations under consideration at the level of the subjects of the Russian Federation are noted. The existing legislative models for involving local self-government bodies in the exercise of the authority to organize specialized parking lots for the storage of detained vehicles are analyzed. In the research paper, the Author presents options for determining the performers of services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, analyzes the legal grounds for the implementation of each of them, taking into account the existing law enforcement, including judicial practice. For the purpose of unified legal regulation of relations on the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, aimed at implementing measures to ensure the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense in the form of detention of a vehicle, the Author formulated proposals for the legislative consolidation of the federal authorities of the authority to determine the procedure for selecting performers of services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles. To ensure equal opportunities for economic entities to carry out activities in the market of services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, the Author proposed, within the framework of the above procedure, to determine the requirements for the performers of these services, as well as the criteria for their competitive selection. At the same time, the paper substantiates the need for mandatory application of the territorial criterion for the selection of performers of these services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, taking into account not only the boundaries of the relevant municipality, but also the distance of specialized parking lots from socially significant objects.

1. Trusov A. I. Issues of the Administrative Law Regulation of Motor Vehicle Detention. Transportation Law. 2020;2:22-24. (In Russ.).

2. Sokolov A. Yu. The Administrative Arrest as a Means of Providing Clerical Correspondence in Administrative Offences. Law. Legislation. Person. 2010;3:88-95. (In Russ.).

3. Sokolov A. Yu. Legal Regulation of the Participation in the Proceedings on Administrative Offences of Subjects of Commercial Activity. Legal Policy and Legal Life. 2020;3:44-54. (In Russ.).

4. Kazina T. V. Legal Consequences of Administrative Transport Vehicle Detention. Transportation Law. 2017;2:20-24. (In Russ.).

5. Molchanov P. V. On Some Questions of Security Measures on Production Administrative Offenses of Road Traffic. Izvestiya Tula State University. 2010;2:345-351. (In Russ.).

6. Gubareva Т. I. New Procedure of Detention of Transport Means Under the Russian Legislation. Jurist. 2012;22:31-35. (In Russ.).

7. Kovalev A. V. Anti-Competitive Requirements for the Selection of Persons To Provide Services for the Movement of and (or) Storage of Detained Vehicles. Journal of Modern Competition. 2015;9(4):47-64. (In Russ.).

8. Kovalev A. V. Services for the Storage of the Detained Vehicles as Sphere of Circulation of Commodities. Application Measures of Antimonopoly Reaction. Journal of Modern Competition. 2014;6:50-58. (In Russ.).

9. Zatolokin A.A. Ensuring The Rights Of The Owner (Driver) During The Movement And Storage Of The Detained Vehicle. Society and Law. 2019;1:94-97. (In Russ.).

10. Zaitsev R.Ya. To the Question of the Use By the Police of Measures to Prevent Administrative Violations Related To the Operation, Use and Management of Vehicles. Bulletin of Krasnodar University of Russian MIA. 2019;3:70-74. (In Russ.).

11. Mad’yarova A. V. Creation of Specialized Parking Lots for the Storing of Detained Vehicles: The Competence of Local Authorities. Practice of Municipal Management. 2013;10:52-60. (In Russ.).

12. Isaev V. M. Detention and Prohibition of Operation of Vehicles as Measures of Software Production by Administrative Cases. Law and Legislation. 2011;9:102-103. (In Russ.).

13. Goldblatt R. B., Weinisch K. Evacuation Planning, Human Factors, and Traffic Engineering: Developing Systems for Training and Effective Response. TR News. 2005;238:13-17.

14. Shormee S. Automated Traffic Law Enforcement System: A Feasibility Study for the Congested Cities of Developing Countries. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Interdisciplinary Sciences. 2020;3(1):346–363. https://doi.org/10.15157/IJITIS.2020.3.1.346-363

15. Xie C. Evacuation Network Optimization: Models, Solution Methods, and Applications. Ithaca, New York: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University; 2008. 288 p.

16. Zhang Z., Herrera N., Tuncer E., Parr S., Shapouri M., Wolshon B. Effects of Shadow Evacuation on Megaregion Evacuations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2020;83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102295