Normative Legal Models of Administrative Expulsion: a Comparative Legal Research
https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2016-1-91-97
Abstract
Different countries solve issues of grounds and procedure for the expulsion of foreign nationals outside the country in their own way. However, modern countries gradually unify their regulatory legal models of expulsion. This is due to the impact of generally accepted international norms and principles, as well as the identical problems associated with finding a large number of immigrants. Conducted comparative study have shown that the expulsion of foreigners considered by the official authorities of the various states as an integral part of the sovereign powers aimed at protecting their own legal order.
About the Author
Oleg N. Sherstoboev
Siberian Institute of Management - branch of RANHiGS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, section 64. URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/33/ section/64
2. AufenthG. URL: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/aufenthg_2004/index.html
3. Международный пакт о гражданских и по- литических правах : принят резолюцией 2200 А (XXI) Генер. Ассамблеи, Нью-Йорк, 16 дек. 1966 г. // Бюлл. Верхов. Суда Рос. Федерации. 1994. № 12. С. 5-11
4. Гессен, В. М. Исключительное положение / В. М. Гессен. - СПб. : Изд. Юрид. кн. скл. «Право», 1908. - 422 с.
5. Соловей, Ю. П. О совершенствовании законодательной основы судебного контроля за реализацией органами публичной администрации и их должностными лицами дискреционных полномочий / Ю. П. Соловей // Адм. право и процесс. - 2015. - № 2. - С. 46-51.
6. Bast, J. Of General Principles and Trojan Horses - Procedural Due Process in Immigration Proceedings under EU Law / Bast // German Law Journal. - 2010. - Vol. 9. - P. 1017-1022.
7. Bradley, A. W. Constitutional and Administrative Law / A. W. Bradley, K. D. Ewing. - 14th ed. - Edinburgh : Pearson Education Ltd., 2007. - 922 p.
8. Chae Chan Ping v. U.S., 130 U.S. 581 (1889) [Электронный ресурс] // FindLaw. - Режим доступа: http://caselaw. lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=130&invol=581 (дата обращения: 20.02.2013).
9. Deibel, K. Ausweisung von Ausländern unter Berücksichtigung der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte / K. Deibel // ZAR. - 2009. - № 4. - S. 121-126.
10. Feere, J. Plenary Power: Should Judges Control U.S. Immigration Policy? [Электронный ресурс] / J. Feere // Center for Immigration Studies. - Режим доступа: http://www.cis.org/plenarypower (дата обращения: 03.02.2014).
11. Gesetz über den Aufenthalt, die Erwerbstätigkeit und die Integration von Ausländern im Bundesgebiet. AufenthG. Ausfertigungsdatum: 30.07.2004. [Электронный ресурс] // Gesetze im Internet. - Режим доступа: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/aufenthg_2004/gesamt.pdf (дата обращения: 04.01.2013).
12. Gibson, B. The New Home Office: An Introduction / B. Gibson, D. Faulkner. - S. l. : Waterside Press, 2008. - 172 p.
13. Grable, D. M. Personhood Under The Due Process Clause: a Constitutional Analysis of The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act 1996 / D. M. Grable // Cornell Law Review. - 1998. - Vol. 83. - № 3. - P. 821-865.
14. Heinz, W. S. Germany: State Responses to Terrorist Challenges and Human Right / W. S. Heinz // National Insecurity and Human Right. Democracies Debate Counterterrorism / Ed. by A. Brysk and G. Shafir. - Berkley, Los Angeles, London: Global, Area, and International Archive University of California Press, 2007. - P. 157-176.
15. Illigal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 [Электронный ресурс] // Homeland Security Seal, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. - Режим доступа: http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/PUBLAW/HTML/ PUBLAW/0-0-0-10948.html (дата обращения: 04.08.2015).
16. Immigration Act, 1971. [Электронный ресурс] // The National Archives. - Режим доступа: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1971/77/contents (дата обращения: 03.08.2013).
17. Immigration and Asylum Act, 1999 [Электронный ресурс] // The National Archives. - Режим доступа: http://www. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/33/contents (дата обращения: 04.08.2013).
18. Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (03-674) 543 U.S 335 (2005) [Электронный ресурс] // The Supreme Court of the United States. - Режим доступа: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/04pdf/03-674.pdf (дата обращения: 12.07.2015).
19. Judulang v. Holder, Attorney General 10-694 (2011) [Электронный ресурс] // The Supreme Court of the United States. - Режим доступа: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-694.pdf (дата обращения: 05.02.2015).
20. Kirkagac, N. Die Unschuldsvermutung im Ausweisungsrecht / N. Kirkagac // Asylmagazin. - 2011. - № 6. - S. 182-186.
21. Legomsky, S. H. Deportation and the War on Independence / S. H. Legomsky // Cornell Law Review. - 2006. - Vol. 91. - № 2. - P. 369-409.
22. Regina v Alrich Augustus Hamilton and Christopher Cordover Kyle. № [2007] EWHC 194 [QB] [Электронный ресурс] // The National Archives. - Режим доступа: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218200720/http:/www.hmcourts- service.gov.uk/cms/144_11368.htm (дата обращения: 25.02.2013).
23. Romero, V. C. On Elián and Aliens: a Political Solution to the Plenary Power Problem / V. C. Romero // Journal of Legisla- tion and Public Policy. - 2001. - Vol. 4. - № 2. - P. 343-386.
24. Thym, D. Migrationsverwaltungsrecht / D. Thym. - Tübengen : Mohr Siebeck, 2010. - 450 S.
Review
For citations:
Sherstoboev O.N. Normative Legal Models of Administrative Expulsion: a Comparative Legal Research. Siberian Law Review. 2016;(1):91-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2016-1-91-97
Views:
236
Email this article 