Preview

Siberian Law Review

Advanced search

The Concept of Militant Democracy in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights

https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2026-23-2-247-266

EDN: BMAXKK

Abstract

This article examines the concept of militant democracy (démocratie militante, wehrhafte Demokratie) in the context of its application in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Despite Russia’s withdrawal from the Council of Europe and the cessation of the European Court of Human Rights’ jurisdiction in respect of the Russian Federation in 2022, the study of this concept remains relevant for Russian constitutional-law scholarship. It makes it possible to gain a deeper understanding of universal mechanisms for protecting the constitutional order, provides comparative material for the development of national legal doctrines, and offers insight into approaches that may prove valuable in improving Russian legal instruments for countering extremism and the abuse of rights. The doctrine of militant democracy, developed by the German scholar Karl Loewenstein in the 1930s, provides for legal mechanisms for the preventive protection of democratic regimes against anti-democratic political forces. The article analyzes the normative embodiment of this concept in Article 17 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which prohibits the abuse of rights, and identifies its principal instruments: a “hard” instrument, involving the complete denial of legal protection, and “soft” instruments, operating within the framework of proportionality review. The article offers a detailed analysis of cases concerning racist speech, Holocaust denial, or negationism, the justification of Nazi crimes, and the dissolution of political parties pursuing anti-democratic objectives. In addition to specific cases, the study draws on the works of European constitutional scholars and on Council of Europe documents relating to the travaux préparatoires of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The article concludes that the European Court of Human Rights has developed specific criteria for assessing the lawfulness of restrictive measures: the compatibility of the political regime being promoted with democratic principles; the legality of the means employed; the existence of a real and immediate threat; and the actual capacity to abolish democratic institutions. The conceptual framework and criteria developed by the European Court of Human Rights constitute a valuable resource that extends beyond jurisdictional boundaries and is capable of enriching the development of balanced approaches to protecting the foundations of statehood while respecting individual rights in any legal system.

About the Author

A. V. Koydan
Lomonosov Moscow State University,
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Koydan, postgraduate student of the Department of Constitutional Law 

Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The Author declares no conflict of interest.



References

1. Loewenstein K. Autocracy Versus Democracy in Contemporary Europe, I. The American Political Science Review. 1935;29(4):571-593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1947789

2. Loewenstein K. Legislative Control of Political Extremism in European Democracies. Columbia Law Review. 1938;38(4):591-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1116432

3. Loewenstein K. Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I. The American Political Science Review. 1937;31(3):417-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1948164

4. Kilinç U. La conception de la démocratie militante dans la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme. 2012;90:297-328. (In French.)

5. Haarscher G. Les périls de la démocratie militante. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme. 2010;84:977-1003. (In French.)

6. Van Drooghenbroeck S. L’article 17 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme est-il indispensable? Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme. 2001;46:541-566. (In French.)

7. Wachsmann P. Liberté d’expression et négationnisme. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme. 2001;46:585-599. (In French.)

8. Levinet M. La fermeté bienvenue de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme face au négationnisme. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme. 2004;59:653-678. (In French.)

9. Tejada J. T. La doctrine de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme sur l’interdiction des partis politiques. Revue française de droit constitutionnel. 2012;90:339-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rfdc.090.0339 (In French.)

10. Flauss J.-F. L’abus de droit dans le cadre de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme. Revue universitaire des droits de l’homme. 1992;4(1):461-468. (In French.)

11. Netanel N. Applying Militant Democracy to Defend Against Social Media Harms. Cardozo Law Review. 2023;45(2):101-190.

12. Malkopoulou A., Kirshner A. S. (Eds.). Militant Democracy and Its Critics: Populism, Parties, Extremism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019. 296 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474445627

13. Sajó A. Militant Constitutionalism. In: Malkopoulou A., Kirshner A. S. (Eds.). Militant Democracy and Its Critics: Populism, Parties, Extremism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019. P. 187–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474445627-013

14. Spielmann A., Spielmann D. La notion de l’abus de droit à la lumière de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales. In: L’abus de droit et les concepts équivalents: principe et applications actuelles. Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe Publ.; 1990. P. 58–77. (In French.)

15. Cohen-Jonathan G. Le droit de l’homme à la non-discrimination raciale. Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme. 2001;46:665-704. (In French.)

16. De Gouttes R. A propos du conflit entre le droit à la liberté d’expression et le droit à la protection contre le racisme. In: Mélanges en hommage à Louis Edmond Pettiti. Bruxelles: Bruylant Publ.; 1998. P. 251–260. (In French.)

17. Tulkens F. Les relations entre le négationnisme et les droits de l’homme: la jurisprudence de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. In: Le droit dans une Europe en changement. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universiteto Leidybos centras Publ.; 2008. P. 215–232. (In French.)

18. Capoccia G. Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self-Preservation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2013;9:207-226. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-134020


Review

For citations:


Koydan A.V. The Concept of Militant Democracy in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Siberian Law Review. 2026;23(2):247-266. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2026-23-2-247-266. EDN: BMAXKK

Views: 50

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)