Political and Legal Characteristics of Law Enforcement Agencies
https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2025-22-1-57-72
EDN: AUCBEZ
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive political and legal analysis of law enforcement agencies as the primary actors in law enforcement. It identifies conceptual challenges in understanding both law enforcement agencies and their functions. Using methods from legal political science and a broad array of sources, the author defines the essential political and socio-legal characteristics of law enforcement agencies. The implementation of law enforcement activities through state coercion should constitute the core responsibility of authorized state bodies, which are equipped with the necessary resources and tools. The law enforcement system may also include government institutions that directly execute functions and powers on behalf of law enforcement agencies. The legal objective of the law enforcement system is to uphold public order, while its practical goal is to ensure security in specific spheres of public life. Service in law enforcement is a distinct form of public service and is carried out on a professional basis. The identified features are synthesized in the author's definition of the term “law enforcement agencies”. The diversity of such agencies predetermines the specific nature of their political functions, shaped by their institutional position and role within the state apparatus and in line with official policy. The internal policy of each law enforcement agency is built on a strict organizational structure and hierarchy. Political orientations and ambitions of senior leadership play a crucial role – not only in shaping internal interactions among staff but also in determining the external goals and strategic positioning of operational and other personnel. The leadership of law enforcement agencies is obligated to align both internal and external operations with the documented political will of central government authorities. These agencies require a clear framework of priorities, objectives, and an appropriate ideological foundation for their activities. The essential role of law enforcement agencies in the political sphere is most evident in their efforts to counter global threats such as corruption, terrorism, and extremism.
About the Author
I. A. KuzminRussian Federation
Igor A. Kuzmin, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and History of State and Law,
1, Shevtsova str., Irkutsk, 664035.
ResearcherID: J-29922016.
Competing Interests:
The Author declares no conflict of interest.
References
1. Gabaraev A. Sh., Novikov A. V. State Policy of Russia in the Law Enforcement Sphere: Strategic Planning. Theories and Problems of Political Studies. 2022;11(6A):64-71. https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2023.82.71.007 (In Russ.)
2. Mal’ko A. V. Legal Policy and Legal System in Modern Russia. The Legal Culture. 2023;4:95-97. (In Russ.)
3. Gavrilenko A. A. The Notion and the System of Law-Enforcement Agencies. Siberian Law Herald. 2009;1:94-100. (In Russ.)
4. Shurukhnov N. G. Analysis of the Essence of Signs that Allows Us To Consider the Police a Law Enforcement Agency. Legal Gnoseology. 2024;1:50-62. (In Russ.)
5. Gazetdinov N. I. The Meaning of “Law Enforcement” for the Educational Process and Legal Practice. Russian Justice. 2014;4:64-67. (In Russ.)
6. Kozbanenko V. A. Other Types of Public Service-Law Enforcement Service: the Law and Doctrine. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018;9:92-101. https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2018.94.9.092-101 (In Russ.)
7. Domnina O. V. Functions of the Law Enforcement System in Russia: General Theoretical Perspective. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2022;1:37-47. https://doi.org/10.24412/2227-7315-2022-1-37-47 (In Russ.)
8. Vyskrebentseva M. Y. Definition and Types of Political Responsibility of Ministers in the History of Domestic Political and Legal Thought. The Bryansk State University Herald. 2014;2:184-188. (In Russ.)
9. Malko A. V., Nyrkov V. V., Ignatenkova K. E. The Concept of Law-Enforcement Policy in Modern Russia: the Change of Development Direction From Federal to Regional Level. Legal Policy and Legal Life. 2011;4:141-146. (In Russ.)
10. Zakhartsev S. N. To the Question of Forming the Concept “Law Securing Policy”. Tambov University Review: Series Humanities. 2010;7:304-309. (In Russ.)
11. Petrov D. E. Powers Structures and Public Policy in Modern Russia. Izvestia of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Politology. 2010;10(1):124-127. (In Russ.)
12. Moiseev A. B., Satsuta A. I. Interaction of Political Regime and Law Enforcement Authorities. The Authority. 2019;27(3):125-129. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i3.6424 (In Russ.)
13. Kopylov I. A., Satsuta A. I. Law Enforcement Bodies of the Russian State as a System and Institute of State Authority. Bulletin of Catherine the Great National Institute. 2019;3:129-136. (In Russ.)
14. Begeza V. V. Problems of Interaction of Law Enforcement Agencies To Ensure National Security. Law and Politics. 2022;9:20-29. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2022.9.38379 (In Russ.)
15. Yakovlev K. L., Yakovleva E. I., Yakovleva O. N. State and Legal Foundations for the Organization of Law Enforcement Agencies of Foreign Countries. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ.; 2019. 160 p. (In Russ.)
16. Grishchenko L. L. Features of the Activities of the Internal Affairs Bodies in the Context of a Special Military Operation. Academic Thought. 2022;2:106-111. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kuzmin I.A. Political and Legal Characteristics of Law Enforcement Agencies. Siberian Law Review. 2025;22(1):57-72. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2025-22-1-57-72. EDN: AUCBEZ