The Place of Cybercrime

This article addresses the criminal-legal characteristics of the location of cybercrimes – offenses committed using electronic or information and telecommunications networks, including the Internet. The concept of the crime’s location in criminal and criminal procedural law is examined, including possible approaches to defining a unified concept of location, which is associated with specific legal consequences in criminal and criminal procedural law: sector-specific (focused on issues within a specific field) and cross-sectoral (aiming for a universal definition applicable across fields). It is noted that all approaches require defining the crime’s location based on legal fiction. This means the crime’s location is formally tied to the territorial localization of one of the crime’s elements (usually the place of action and/or the place of social harm). Based on the explanations provided by the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and current judicial practice, it is concluded that both criminal and procedural law regard the crime’s location as determined by the time of its commission (as per Article 9, Part 2, of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Therefore, the location of a crime is considered to be where the socially dangerous action (or inaction) occurred, regardless of where the consequences took place. The article also analyzes issues surrounding the determination of cybercrime locations, considering the complex design of their objective aspects. The location of a single cybercrime involving several illegal actions, separated in both time and space, should be considered the location of each action. Procedurally, such a crime is regarded as “initiated in one place and completed in another”, which affects jurisdiction based on the “place of completion” (interpreted in procedural, rather than criminal, terms). This is typically the place where the final act that constitutes part of the crime occurred (per Article 32, Part 2, and Article 152, Part 2, of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation).

1. Bagautdinov F. N., Zhurba S. M. Actual Problems of Determining the Territorial Jurisdiction of Frauds Committed Using Modern Means of Communication. Criminal Law. 2019;3:96-100. (In Russ.)

2. Lukinov A. S. The Site of Investigation of Wire Fraud. Zakonnost Journal. 2014;9:43-44. (In Russ.)

3. Frost S. M., Fedosov A. Ye. The Problems of Determination of a Place of Investigation of Fraud Committed With Usage of Electronic Payments. Zakonnost Journal. 2015;1:51-53. (In Russ.)

4. Frantsiforov Yu. V. Location of a Telephone Fraud Crime Site. Zakonnost Journal. 2016;2:51-53. (In Russ.)

5. Stepanov P. P., Gribanova D. V. Locus Delicti of Theft of Non-Cash Funds and Territorial Jurisdiction of a Criminal Case. Criminal Law. 2023;9:49-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52390/20715870_2023_9_49 (In Russ.)

6. Beloborodov V. B. Territorial Principle of Criminal Jurisdiction: Place Where the Crime Was Committed as the Place for the Onset of Socially Dangerous Consequences. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law. 2018;3:89- 101. (In Russ.)

7. Ilina A. I. Rules of the Application of Criminal Law in Space (Comparative Legal Study). Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2012. 208 p. (In Russ.)

8. Pikurov N. I. On the Spatial Limits of Criminal Jurisdiction. In: Criminal Law: Strategy for Development in the 21st Century. Moscow: Prospekt Publ.; 2013. P. 123–128. (In Russ.)

9. Timoshenko Yu. A. A Crime Scene: Criminal Law and Procedural Aspects. Zakonnost Journal. 2015;7:37-39. (In Russ.)

10. Boitsov A. I. Application of Criminal Law in Time and Space. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publ.; 1995. 257 p. (In Russ.)

11. Arkhipov A. V. Problems of Detection of a Scene of Fraud Against Non-Cash Funds. Criminal Law. 2016;3:4-10. (In Russ.)

12. Shchepelkov V. F. Criminal Law: Overcoming Contradictions and Gaps. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2003. 416 p. (In Russ.)

13. Buz S. I. Cyber Crimes: Concept, Essence and General Characteristic. Jurist-Pravoved. 2019;4:78-82. (In Russ.)

14. Guzeeva O. S. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation with Regard To Internet Crime. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2013;10:15-19. (In Russ.)

15. Esakov G. A. Locus Delicti in Misappropriation: the New Approach in Judicial Practice. Criminal Law. 2023;3:54-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52390/20715870_2023_3_54 (In Russ.)

16. Pavlyuchenko Yu. V. Crime Scene and Its Commission End-Time on Fraud Cases in Relation To Wire Funds Transfers. Criminal Law. 2018;2:69-78. (In Russ.)