Investigation of Embezzlement of Budget Funds: Efficiency Issues

   The paper analyzes scientific and theoretical, organizational and practical ideas about the effectiveness and inefficiency of the investigation of criminal cases in general, and cases of embezzlement of budgetary funds, in particular. Case studies of effective and ineffective investigation of the specified criminal activity are given. The definition of effectiveness is formulated in relation to the investigation of embezzlement of budgetary funds, in which compliance with the main priorities of the state policy of the Russian Federation is important. The paper analyzes the criteria for evaluating the law enforcement activities of law enforcement agencies. There are contradictions between the criteria of real effectiveness of the investigation and the requirements of statistical reporting by investigative authorities. In the context of the effective investigation criterion and with regard to the provisions of the “National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation” approved by the President of the Russian Federation, priorities of effective investigation in criminal cases of embezzlement of budgetary funds have been identified. This is a priority for crime prevention, the need to combat, first of all, the most socially dangerous types of embezzlement committed by public authorities and organizations with state participation, especially corruption concerning those involved in national projects and fulfilling state defense orders. Full compensation for the damage caused and an increase in the level of responsibility for suchlike criminal activity are also a priority. The paper concludes that an effective investigation is the observance of these priorities. They should concern practical, organizational and managerial, and scientific activities. The requirements of statistical reporting by law enforcement agencies need to be adapted to the criteria of the real effectiveness of the investigation of criminal cases. Forensic scholarly research has to be aimed at providing priorities for the investigation of embezzlement, to demonstrate the implementation of efficiency criteria through the case studies as recommendations.

1. Znikin V. K. The Concept of Effectiveness and Quality of a Preliminary Investigation. Tomsk State University Journal of Law. 2014;1:25-32. (In Russ.)

2. Drapkin L. Ya. On the Effectiveness of Investigation. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Results of Research Conducted in 1969. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovsk Law Institute Publ.; 1970. P. 147. (In Russ.)

3. Fatkulin F. N. Current Issues of the Effectiveness of the Soviet Criminal Proceedings. In: Issues of the Effectiveness of the Soviet Criminal Proceedings. Kazan: Kazan University Publ.; 1976. P. 3–27. (In Russ.)

4. Garmaev Yu. P. Effective, Inefficient and Illegal Investigation of Corruption Crimes. Eurasian Advocacy. 2022;4:50-55. doi: 10.52068/2304-9839_2022_59_4_50 (In Russ.)

5. Garmaev Yu. P Priorities of State Policy and Criminalistic Investigation Methodology. In: Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics: Legal Foundations, Theory, Practice, Didactics (Dedicated to the 75^th Anniversary of the Birth of Professor B. Ya. Gavrilov). Moscow: - Academy of Management of the MIA of Russia Publ.; 2023. P. 111–117. (In Russ.)

6. Shaver B. M. The Subject and Method of Criminalistics. Socialist Legality. 1938;6:56-82. (In Russ.)

7. Popova O. A. Assessing the Effectiveness of Law Enforcement and the Quality of Crime Investigations. Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2015;1-1:1900. (In Russ.)

8. Popov V. V. Issues of Evaluating the Efficiency of the Police Activities. Journal of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia. 2013;3:160-165. (In Russ.)

9. Desyatov M. S., Lugovich S. M. Evaluation of Efficiency of the Interdepartmental Interaction Between Entities of Operational-Search Activities. Journal of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia. 2013;4:103-107. (In Russ.)

10. Kanevskii L. L. Criminalistic Problems of Investigation and Prevention of Juvenile Crimes. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk University Publ.; 1991. 228 p. (In Russ.)

11. Garmaev Yu. P. Primary Fight Against «Minor» Corruption Crimes as a Problem of Judicial Practice and Forensics. Lex Russica. 2023;76(3):63-71. doi: 10.17803/1729-5920.2023.196.3.063-071 (In Russ.)

12. Luneev V. V. Corruption: Political, Economic, Organizational and Legal Issues. Moscow: Yurist” Publ.; 2001. 429 p. (In Russ.)

13. Garmaev Yu. P. Legal Education and Legal Awareness in the Criminal Proceedings and Forensic Science. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyi zhurnal. 2015;5:258-270. (In Russ.)