On Expanding the Range of Victims of Coercion To Testify

   Building a state governed by the rule of law involves improving the mechanism for combating encroachments on justice ensuring observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. In changing criminology realities, in the focus of discussion are the ways to increase the effectiveness of guarantees
aimed to observe the rights and freedoms of persons involved in criminal proceedings, also with the help of criminal legal means. The paper presents the criminal law analysis of the signs of a victim of coercion to testify (Article 302 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).

   The subject of the study is the set of definitions used by the legislator to describe the signs of a victim of coercion to testify, as well as the provisions of criminal procedure legislation regulating the legal status of participants in criminal proceedings protected by the norm under consideration. The analysis of the stated problems is based on the legal views of the highest judicial authorities, with regard to historical, legal and doctrinal aspects. An interdisciplinary approach made it possible to identify the peculiarities of the legal status of persons classified by the legislator as victims of coercion to testify. The paper analyzes the legal status of the person whose criminal case was severed from the rest as a result of a plea bargain with him, as well as the person against whom proceedings to take compulsory measures of medical nature are conducted. The study focuses on the applicant, the eyewitness, the victim of the crime and parties of no procedural status but possessing important criminal information. The current criminal legislation does not provide for bringing the offenders to justice in case of undue influence against parties with an informal procedural status in the course of criminal proceedings. The paper substantiates the need to classify these parties as victims of coercion to testify. There is a discrepancy in the terminology of criminal and criminal procedure laws, and imbalance in providing punishment according to general and special rules. The undertaken research proposes to improve the legal and clerical condition of the current version of Article 302 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in terms of clarifying the range of victims, and to review the penalty with regard to the general rule.

1. Lobanova L. V. Crimes Against Justice: Theoretical Problems of Classification and Legislative Regulation. Volgograd: Volgograd University Publ.; 1999. 268 p. (In Russ.)

2. Yashin A. V. Problems of Preventing Crimes Against Participants of Criminal Proceedings by Criminal Deterrence. University Proceedings. Volga Region. Social Sciences. 2015;3:55-63. (In Russ.)

3. Derishev Yu. V., Zemlyanitsin E. I. Procedural Status of the Person Against Whom a Preliminary Verification of Reporting a Crime Is Conducted. Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2014;3:95-100. (In Russ.)

4. Baisalueva E. F. Crimes Against Justice Committed By Parties Conducting a Preliminary Investigation. Tyumen: Tyumen Advanced Training Institute of the MIA of Russia Publ.; 2018. 148 p. (In Russ.)

5. Gaag I. A. Some Problems of the Disposition of Testimonial Compulsion. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2015;4-2:201-204. (In Russ.)

6. Lopashenko N. A., Golikova A. V., Kovlagina D. A., Komyagin R. A. Crimes Against Justice (Chapter 31 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2023. 560 p. (In Russ.)

7. Gorelik A. S., Lobanova L. V. Crimes Against Justice. St. Petersburg: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2005. 491 p. (In Russ.)

8. Yashin V. N., Aksenov V. V. The Issues of Opening a Criminal Case Under the New Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Investigator. 2004;1:22-24. (In Russ.)

9. Yashin A. V. Criminological Features of Crimes Against Parties of Criminal Proceedings and the Basic Rules of Their Prevention. Moscow: Academy of Natural History Publ.; 2016. 238 p. (In Russ.)

10. Kudryavtsev V. L. Coercion To Testify (Corpus Delicti) as a Circumstance Excluding the Admissibility of Evidence (Issues of Theory and Practice). St. Petersburg: St. Peterburg institute (branch) of the ARSUJ Publ.; 2018. 84 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kudryavtsev V. N. The General Theory of Crime Classification. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura Publ.; 1972. 352 p. (In Russ.)