Mediation as a Form of Restorative Justice

   The relevance of the proposed study is due to the existing problems of the institution of conciliation in the criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation.

   At the same time, no detailed legal regulation of the conciliation mechanism in the CPC of the Russian Federation significantly reduces the effectiveness of law enforcement through using alternatives to criminal prosecution. As a result, there is a need to find new effective ways to resolve criminal law disputes allowing for the full restoration of the rights of victims of crime. One of these methods is mediation procedure, which contributes to resolving criminal law conflicts in an extremely constructive and mutually beneficial way for both sides of the dispute with the help of an independent third party (mediator). This procedure is reflected in the concept of restorative justice.

   The purpose of the study is to determine the theoretical background of the institution of conciliation in criminal proceedings on the basis of a historical, legal and comparative analysis of its procedures, as well as to identify the issues related to law enforcement. In this regard, the proposed paper examines a well-established mechanism for the settlement of criminal law conflicts in western legal systems.

   This mechanism provides for a special subject of conciliation – a mediator possessing professionalism, independence and impartiality. The paper substantiates the reason of introducing the institution of mediation into domestic criminal proceedings, proposes its functional and legal model providing for a range of crimes with possible conciliation, the stages of its implementation, as well as requirements for mediators as candidates. The paper extensively uses comparative legal method helping to determine the prerequisites for introducing the institute of mediation in the Russian criminal procedure legislation as an independent form of resolution of criminal law conflicts. The Authors come to the following conclusions: It is advisable to update the provision of Article 25 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and codify the concept of mediation as “a way to resolve a criminal conflict used with the voluntary consent of the victim and the offender with the help of an impartial third party” and the conditions for its application. It is necessary to legislate a new impartial and independent party in criminal proceedings – a mediator who will act as a third party in the mediation, exclusively on a professional basis. Moreover, the Federal Law “On Alternative Dispute Settlement with the Help of Mediator (Mediation)” dated July 27, 2010 No. 193-FZ needs to be edited in terms of extending mediation to criminal law relations, which will allow conflicting parties to resort to this procedure. In particular, amendments to this law should concern the requirements of a professional mediator, including those involved in criminal proceedings.

1. Nestor N. V. The Concept, Principles and Forms of Resorative Justice. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Yuridicheskie Nauki. 2012;4:28–32. (In Russ.)

2. Galimova M. A., Astakhova A. On the Content of the Institute of Restorative Justice. In: Current Issues of Combating Crime: Theory and Practice. Pt. 1. Krasnoyarsk, 2022. P. 164–167. (In Russ.)

3. Van Ness D. W., Heetderks Strong K. Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice. 4^th ed. New Province, N. Y.: Matthew Bender & Co., Inc; 2010. 259 p.

4. Aertsen I. Rebuilding Community Connections – Mediation and Restorative Justice in Europe. Kyiv: Zakharenko Publ.; 2008. 183 p. (In Russ.)

5. Konin V. V. The Mediation in Celerity Criminal Procedure. Scientific Notes of Orel State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences. 2010;3-1:268-270. (In Russ.)

6. Paholkin N. S., Smolkova I. V. Concept of Restorative Justice in Criminal Procedure. Izvestiya of Irkutsk State Economics Academy. 2012;3:131-135. (In Russ.)

7. Zabuga E. E. Supranational Regulation of Mediation in Criminal Procedure. Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2012;3:80-84. (In Russ.)

8. Nosyreva E. I. Alternative Dispute Resolution in the USA. Moscow: Gorodets Publ.; 2005. 320 p. (In Russ.)

9. Golovko L. V. Alternatives to Criminal Prosecution: European Practice and the Russian Criminal Procedure Context. Bulletin of Restorative Justice. 2003;5:11-12. (In Russ.)

10. Tcheprasova Ju. V., Saturina N. A. Problems and Prospects of Implementation of the Mediation in Criminal Proceedings (on the Example of Lipetsk Region). Economic Problems and Legal Practice. 2017;6:231-235. (In Russ.)

11. Yakovleva L. V., Yakovlev V. V. The Possibility of Application of Mediation on Criminal Cases. Vestnik Advanced Training Institute of the MIA of Russia. 2018;4:97-101. (In Russ.)

12. Kurilko A. A., Andreeva M. M. Current Issues of Conciliation of the Parties in Criminal Law. In: Current Issues of Jurisprudence. Pskov: Pskov State University Publ.; 2020. P. 100–110. (In Russ.)

13. Matkina D. V., Gus’kova A. P. Mediation in Criminal Procedure. Russian Judge. 2009;2:34-37. (In Russ.)

14. Smirnov A. V. Adversarial Proceedings. St. Petersburg: Al’fa Publ.; 2001. 320 p. (In Russ.)

15. Semenyako M. E. On Topicality of Procedures of Alternative Settlement of Disputes in the Court. Russian Judge. 2009;7:24-27. (In Russ.)

16. Savchenko A. N., Ureneva O. V. Mediation in Criminal Trial. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2015;25:131-135. (In Russ.)

17. Arutyunyan A. A. Mediation in Criminal Procedure. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2013. 200 p. (In Russ.)

18. Galygina E. S. To the Question About Possibilities of Application of the Mediation’s Institute in the Criminal Proceedings of Russia. Scientific Notes of the Tambov Branch of the RUYS. 2020;18:80-85. (In Russ.)

19. Hudoykina T. V., Sitkina A. D. Prospects for the Development of Mediation in Connection with the Introduction of the Institute of Juridical Concliation. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021;5-4:188-192. doi: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-5-4-188-192 (In Russ.)

20. Gradsky V. E. The Prosecutor as a Participant of Mediation Procedures in the Criminal Process of the French Republic. In: Trends in Modern Criminal Procedure Legislation of the Russian Federation. Iss. 6. Yekaterinburg: Ural Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia Publ.; 2021. P. 28–31. (In Russ.)

21. Ponasyuk A. M. Furtherance by Attorney-at-Law in the Quality of Mediator to Reconciliation of the Parties in Criminal Proceedings. Scientific Works of the Russian Academy of Advocacy and Notaries. 2010;3:27-32. (In Russ.)

22. Luk’yanchikova E. F., Krivolapov D. M. Participation of a Lawyer in the Mediation Procedure. Theoretical and Applied Aspects of Modern Science. 2014;3-3:140-144. (In Russ.)

23. Kalentieva T. A. To the Question About the Mediation Procedure. Vestnik of Volzhsky University named after V. N. Tatishchev. 2017;2(1):69-76. (In Russ.)

24. Valeev A. T. Mediation in the Russian Criminal Proceedings: Directions of Improving Russian Criminal Procedure Law. Bulletin of the Institute: Crime, Punishment, Correction. 2014;4:47-51. (In Russ.)

25. Sadovnikova M. N., Anishchenko A. S. The Requirements for Mediator: Some Problems of the Legal Regulation in Russian Federation and Modern International Approach. Siberian Law Herald. 2019;4:114-118. (In Russ.)

26. Fakurdinova A. G. On the Issue of Quasi-Judicial Elements of Modern Mediation. State Legal Research. 2022;5:244-248. doi: 10.20310/2658-5383-2022-5-244-248 (In Russ.)

27. Luk’yanchikova E. F. Mediation in Criminal Proceedings. Modern Trends in Science and Technology. 2015;6-7:104-109. (In Russ.)