Administrative Discretion in the Investigation of Industrial Accidents and Administrative Investigations in Cases of Violations of State Regulatory Requirements for Occupational Health and Safety

 The participation of the public administration in the investigation of accidents is interconnected with the proceedings on administrative offenses regarding state regulatory requirements for occupational health and safety. In the context of these types of administrative activities, there arise issues related to the application of administrative discretion. In case of no regulation in the legislation of the Russian Federation, discretion is thoroughly investigated in scholarly papers and used by higher courts. In order to protect the rights and interests of citizens and organizations from uncontrolled discretion and ensure law enforcement, it is necessary to establish criteria of discretion, which is implemented by public administration bodies through the adoption of an administrative act. Moreover, the principles of confidence, legal certainty and proportionality are the basis for the legality of actions, their effectiveness and the protection of the constitutional rights of the observees. The purpose of the study is the administrative discretion in the implementation of the procedure for investigation and administrative investigation in cases of violations of state regulatory requirements for occupational health and safety. The paper analyzes the essence of discretion, describes the procedure for investigating industrial accidents in terms of assessing legal certainty and formalization of the procedure, subjective factors influencing the procedure, timing and results of the investigation. The paper also examines the implementation of discretion through the example of administrative investigation into violations of state regulatory requirements for occupational health and safety. The study uses formal legal method, formal logical and dialectical methods. The following conclusions are made: 1) administrative discretion is determined through the categories of "choice" and "freedom" restricted by law; 2) greater legal certainty of the investigation procedure is required; 3) it is necessary to avoid conducting and extending the terms of an administrative investigation with no just cause; 4) it is important to observe proportionality in imposing administrative penalty. 

1. Формирование и развитие отраслей права в исторической и современной правовой реальности России : в 12 т. : моногр. / под ред. д-ра юрид. наук, проф. Р. Л. Хачатурова, д-ра юрид. наук, проф. А. П. Шергина. М. : Юрлитинформ, 2022. Т. VIII: Административное право в системе современного российского права. 736 с.

2. Квоста П. Виды усмотрения и порядок их осуществления в Австрии // Ежегодник публичного права – 2017: Усмотрение и оценочные понятия в административном праве. М. : Инфотропик Медиа, 2017. С. 15–26.

3. Михеева И. В. Административное усмотрение в ведомственном нормотворчестве России // Ежегодник публичного права – 2017: Усмотрение и оценочные понятия в административном праве. М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2017. С. 234–246.

4. Пуделька Й. Понятие усмотрения и разграничение с судебным усмотрением // Ежегодник публичного права – 2017: Усмотрение и оценочные понятия в административном праве. М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2017. С. 2–14.

5. Вебер Й. Противоречивое соотношение правовых понятий: неопределенные правовые понятие, оценочный диапазон и усмотрение на основе двух примеров из судебной практики Федерального административного суда // Ежегодник публичного права – 2017: Усмотрение и оценочные понятия в административном праве. М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2017. С. 296–306.

6. Давыдов К. В. Дискреция как правовой феномен: некоторые ошибки законодателя и правоприменителя (сравнительно-правовой аспект) // Ежегодник публичного права – 2017: Усмотрение и оценочные понятия в административном праве. М.: Инфотропик Медиа, 2017. С. 109–126.

7. Старилов Ю. Н. Административное право как средство разрушения «синдрома бесправия» в современном правовом государстве // Журнал российского права. 2005. № 4 (100). С. 29–45.

8. Старилов Ю. Н. Административные процедуры – неотъемлемая часть законодательства о государственном и муниципальном управлении: проблемы теории, практики и законотворчества // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия «Право». 2019. № 4 (39). С. 8–27.

9. Перенести в английский вариант

10. Khachaturov R. L., Shergin A. P. (Eds.). Formation and Development of Branches of Law in the Historical and Modern Legal Reality of Russia. Vol. VIII: Administrative Law in the System of Modern Russian Law. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2022. 736 p. (In Russ.)

11. Chvosta P. The Different Types of Discretion and the Exercise of Discretion in Austria. In: The Yearbook of Public Law – 2017: Discretion and Value Concept in Administrative Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2017. P. 15–26. (In Russ.).

12. Mikheeva I. V. Administrative Discretion in Subordinate Rule-Making in Russia. In: The Yearbook of Public Law – 2017: Discretion and Value Concept in Administrative Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2017. P. 234– 246. (In Russ.)

13. Pudelka J. The Concept of Discretion and Its Difference from Judicial Discretion. In: The Yearbook of Public Law – 2017: Discretion and Value Concept in Administrative Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2017. P. 2–14. (In Russ.)

14. Weber J. Contradictory Correlation of the Legal Concepts: Vague Legal Concepts, Appraisal Score and Discretion Based On the Two Cases from the Judicial Practice of the Federal Administrative Court. In: The Yearbook of Public Law – 2017: Discretion and Value Concept in Administrative Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2017. P. 296–306. (In Russ.)

15. Davydov K. V. Discretion as a Legal Phenomenon: Some Mistakes of the Legislator and Law Enforcement Officer (Comparative Legal Aspect). In: The Yearbook of Public Law – 2017: Discretion and Value Concept in Administrative Law. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ.; 2017. P. 109–126. (In Russ.)

16. Starilov Yu. N. Applying Administrative Law To Destroy the Rightlessness Syndrome in the Modern Lawful State. Journal of Russian Law. 2005;4;29-45. (In Russ.)

17. Starilov Yu. N. Administrative Procedures – Integral Part of the Legislation About State and Municipal Management: Problems of Theory, Practice and Lawmaking. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Pravo. 2019;4:8-27. (In Russ.)