Preview

Siberian Law Review

Advanced search

Some Features of the Criminal Procedural Status of a Witness

https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-3-323-332

EDN: AJTNSK

Abstract

The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that the problems of the procedural position of a witness today need some addition and adjustment, while this particular issue requires special attention in connection with the expansion of the information space and the simplification of access to information contained in the materials of the criminal case of all participants in criminal proceedings. The question of the participation of a lawyer in criminal proceedings in order to provide qualified legal assistance to a witness remains important. In particular, the procedure for involving a lawyer in a criminal case has not been established, his procedural status has not been clearly regulated, and the issue of the possibility and limits of participation of a lawyer in investigative actions conducted with a witness has not been resolved. The purpose of the study is to analyze the legal problems related to the realization by the witness of his rights, the performance of his duties. The article deals with problematic issues related to the procedural status of a witness, analyzes the relevant norms of domestic criminal procedure legislation and the legislation of a number of foreign countries. The methodological basis of the work was the position of the general scientific dialectical method of cognition and the general theory of law, which made it possible to reveal the essence and features of the procedural status of a witness in pretrial criminal proceedings. The work widely uses the comparative legal method, which made it possible to identify the relationship between domestic and foreign legislation in the field of witness immunity. As a result, the following conclusions were made. It seems that it is necessary to provide a witness who has not formally received the status of a suspect or accused with qualified legal assistance on a mandatory basis, in order to protect his legal rights and interests. In addition, part 3 of Art. 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, supplementing it with a ban on taking evidence from all persons who, by virtue of their official duties, are its bearers and must keep it.

About the Author

O. S. Morozova
Siberian Law University
Russian Federation

Olga S. Morozova, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Criminal

12 Korolenko st., Omsk, 644010



References

1. Slavgorodskaya O. A. Witnessing in Criminal Proceedings. Vestnik IKBFU. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2016;4:29-36. (In Russ.).

2. Vlasova N. A. The Legal Status of a Witness in Legal Proceedings of a Criminal Case Needs To Be Improved. Forensics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2021;4:182-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2587-9820-2021-4-182-193 (In Russ.).

3. Volosova N. Yu. Classification and Kinds of Witness Immunity. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 2010;3:18-23. (In Russ.).

4. Tarnakom O. G. Immunities in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2011. 144 p. (In Russ.).

5. Tatarov L. A. Witness as a Subject of Criminal Proceedings in Russian Federation. State Service and Personnel. 2018;3:105-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2312-0444-2018-10067 (In Russ.).

6. Sokolova O. V. Procedural Capacity of Witness in Modern Criminal Proceedings. Russian Justice System. 2015;10:107-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn2072-909X.2015.10.107 (In Russ.).

7. Akhpanov A. N., Khan A. L. About Cases of Obligatory Participation on Criminal Cases of Advocate of Witness, Having the Right of Defense. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2017;2:110-115. (In Russ.).

8. Davletov A. A. Lawyer-Consultant in Criminal Proceedings. Electronic Supplement to Russian Juridical Journal. 2014;1:15-20. Available: http://electronic.ruzh.org/?q=ru/node/421 (Accessed: August 17th, 2023). (In Russ.).

9. Smol’kova I. V. Actual Problems of Secrets Protected By Federal Law in Russian Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ.; 2014. 350 p. (In Russ.).

10. Yezhova E. V. The Issue of Witness Immunity in Russian Criminal Proceedings. The Rule-of-Law State: Theory and Practice. 2022;1:89-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2022.1.6 (In Russ.).

11. Romanovsky G. B. Banking Secrecy and Investigative Activities of Law Enforcement Agencies. Science. Society. State. 2016;4(1):55-60. Available at: https://esj.pnzgu.ru/files/esj.pnzgu.ru/romanovsky_gb_16_1_07.pdf (Accessed: August 17th, 2023). (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Morozova O.S. Some Features of the Criminal Procedural Status of a Witness. Siberian Law Review. 2023;20(3):323-332. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.19073/2658-7602-2023-20-3-323-332. EDN: AJTNSK

Views: 332


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7602 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7610 (Online)