Euthanasia: Domestic and Foreign Experience of Legal Regulation

The article discusses various approaches to the premature discontinuing of the life of a terminally ill patient both at the state and international level. The purpose of this study is to revise the previously established approach to the use of euthanasia in the Russian Federation. A different view of the use of euthanasia is necessary, among other things, because in some cases, only the premature termination of a person's life may be the only way to end his suffering from a vain struggle with an incurable disease. The difficulties associated with the use of the euthanasia procedure over a long time period are a topic of discussion for many scientists. The relevance of this topic is emphasized by the rapidly changing views on the possibility of using euthanasia from an ethical point of view. More and more international organizations are expressing their own views on euthanasia and assisted suicide. As for the legal order of individual states, there is a tendency to use one of three approaches to ending the suffering of a patient by causing death: the first approach is characterized by a prohibition on the use of euthanasia under the threat of criminal punishment and qualifying such an act as murder in the absence of a special corpus delicti; in the second approach, euthanasia is also a criminal offense, however, the criminal law of states using this approach establishes a special offense that provides for a milder punishment than murder; in the third approach, the law provides for the right to use euthanasia. The article provides a comparative analysis of the euthanasia procedure used in Belgium and the assisted suicide procedure used in Switzerland. In addition, the point of view of the European Court of Human Rights on the issues under consideration is given. The main research method is the analysis of scientific literature on the research topic, the analysis of normative acts of domestic and foreign legislation, a comparative analysis of the legal order of states that carry out various approaches to the application of the euthanasia procedure.

1. Dmitriev Yu. A., Shleneva E. V. The Human Right in the Russian Federation to Carry Out Euthanasia. State and Law. 2000;11:52-59. (In Russ.).

2. Simonyan R. Z. About Improvement of Training of Doctors by the Medical Right. Legal Literacy as Security Measure of Professional Activity of the Doctor. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2016; 6-5:971-975. (In Russ.).

3. Evseeva Ya. V. Euthanasia: History and Modern Debates. (Literature Review). Social Sciences and Humanities. Domestic and Foreign Literature. Series 11: Sociology. 2021;3:12-25. https://doi.org/10.31249/rsoc/2021.03.02 (In Russ.).

4. Loba V. E., Abdulaeva I. A. Euthanasia: Historical and Legal Aspect. Philosophy of Law. 2019;1:85-90. (In Russ.).

5. Kapinus O. S. Euthanasia in the Light of the Right to Life. Moscow: Kameron Publ.; 2006. 479 p. (In Russ.).

6. Volkova N. S. Palliative Care: Matters of Law and Practice. Moscow: Law Firm Contract Publ.; 2020. 120 p. (In Russ.).

7. Inbadas H., Zaman S., Whitelaw S., Clark D. Declarations on Euthanasia and Assisted Dying. Death Studies. 2017;41(9):574-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1317300

8. Gareeva I. A., Kuryakina O. V. Socio-Legal Problems of Euthanasia. Scientists Notes PNU. 2015;6(4):164-167. (In Russ.).

9. Morozov V. I., Popova A. S. Legal Regulation of Euthanasia: What Position Should Russia Adhere To? Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2014;1:47-57. (In Russ.).

10. Satalkar P., Van der Geest S. Escaping the ‘Unprepared Generation’ Trap: Discussions About Euthanasia After a ‘Completed Life’ in the Netherlands. Mortality. 2019;25(3):1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2019.1585780

11. Hamarat N., Pillonel A., Berthod M.-A., Castelli Dransart D. A., Lebeer G. Exploring Contemporary Forms of Aid in Dying: an Ethnography of Euthanasia in Belgium and Assisted Suicide in Switzerland. Death Studies. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2021.1926635

12. Jones D. A., Gastmans C., MacKellar C. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Lessons from Belgium. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 336 p.

13. Raposo V. L. The Right Not to Live. GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences. 2014;4:11. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40741-014-0011-4

14. Richards N. Assisted Suicide as a Remedy for Suffering? The End-of-Life Preferences of British «Suicide Tourists». Medical Anthropology. 2017;36(4):348-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2016.1255610

15. Ogunbanjo G. A., Knapp van Bogaert D. Is There a Place for Voluntary Active Euthanasia in Modern-Day Medicine? South African Family Practice. 2013;55(1):S10-S11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20786204.2013.10874314