<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">slr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирское юридическое обозрение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Law Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2658-7602</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-7610</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Сибирский юридический университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19073/2306-1340-2016-1-85-90</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">slr-633</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЕ ПРАВО, АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС (архивный раздел)</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ПРАВОВАЯ ПРИРОДА АДМИНИСТРАТИВНЫХ АГЕНТСТВ США</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Legal Nature of Administrative Agencies of the USA</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Караманукян</surname><given-names>Давид Тониевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Karamanukyan</surname><given-names>David T.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">davo_lawyer@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Омская юридическая академия</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Omsk Law Academy</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Караманукян Д.Т., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Караманукян Д.Т.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Karamanukyan D.T.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/633">https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/633</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена американской системе административных агентств, являющихся фундаментальной опорой функционирования административной юстиции страны. Проведено исследование понятийно-таксономического аппарата действующей системы административных агентств США, с помощью компаративистского анализа недостатков и достоинств законодательных и доктринальных дефиниций понятия «административное агентство» разработана авторская трактовка данного термина.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In this article the author focuses on the American system of administrative agencies, which are the fundamental pillar for the functioning of administrative justice of the country. A study of the conceptual and taxonomic unit of the current system of administrative agencies of the United States, with the help of comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of legal and doctrinal definitions of the concept of “administrative agency” the author develops an authentic interpretation of the term.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>административная юстиция</kwd><kwd>административное право США</kwd><kwd>административное агентство</kwd><kwd>американское право</kwd><kwd>независимое агентство</kwd><kwd>США</kwd><kwd>administrative justice</kwd><kwd>US administrative law</kwd><kwd>administrative agency</kwd><kwd>American law</kwd><kwd>independent agency</kwd><kwd>USA</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Никеров, Г. И. Административное право США / Г. И. Никеров. - М. : Наука, 1977. - 199 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Никеров, Г. И. Административное право США / Г. И. Никеров. - М. : Наука, 1977. - 199 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Панова, И. В. Административная юстиция в США / И. В. Панова // Адм. право и процесс. - 2014 - № 10. - С. 69-77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Панова, И. В. Административная юстиция в США / И. В. Панова // Адм. право и процесс. - 2014 - № 10. - С. 69-77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хаманева, Н. Ю. Административная юстиция США / Н. Ю. Хаманева // Гос-во и право. - 1993 - № 3. - С. 141-148.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хаманева, Н. Ю. Административная юстиция США / Н. Ю. Хаманева // Гос-во и право. - 1993 - № 3. - С. 141-148.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Administrative Procedure Act. - 1946. 5 U.S.C. - 500 et seq.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Administrative Procedure Act. - 1946. 5 U.S.C. - 500 et seq.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">California Administrative Procedure Act 1947 [Электронный ресурс] // Digital Commons. - Режим доступа: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1417&amp;context=caldocs_agencies (дата обращения: 15.11.2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">California Administrative Procedure Act 1947 [Электронный ресурс] // Digital Commons. - Режим доступа: http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1417&amp;context=caldocs_agencies (дата обращения: 15.11.2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">David W. Cook v. Department of the Army № NY07528210056 [Электронный ресурс] // MSPB. - Режим доступа: http:// www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=238964&amp;version=239234&amp;application=ACROBAT (дата обращения: 08.11.2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">David W. Cook v. Department of the Army № NY07528210056 [Электронный ресурс] // MSPB. - Режим доступа: http:// www.mspb.gov/netsearch/viewdocs.aspx?docnumber=238964&amp;version=239234&amp;application=ACROBAT (дата обращения: 08.11.2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davis, K. C. Administrative law treatise / R. C. Davis. - San Diego : K.C. Davis Publishing Company, 1978. - Vol. 1. - 634 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davis, K. C. Administrative law treatise / R. C. Davis. - San Diego : K.C. Davis Publishing Company, 1978. - Vol. 1. - 634 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Franklin v. Massachusetts 505 U.S. 788 (1992) [Электронный ресурс] // Justia. - Режим доступа: https://supreme.justia. com/cases/federal/us/505/788/case.html (дата обращения: 10.10.2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Franklin v. Massachusetts 505 U.S. 788 (1992) [Электронный ресурс] // Justia. - Режим доступа: https://supreme.justia. com/cases/federal/us/505/788/case.html (дата обращения: 10.10.2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gellhorn, E. Administrative law and process / E. Gellhorn, R. M. Levin. - 4th ed. - St. Paul : West. Publishing Co., 1997. - 459 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gellhorn, E. Administrative law and process / E. Gellhorn, R. M. Levin. - 4th ed. - St. Paul : West. Publishing Co., 1997. - 459 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">N.Y. SAP. LAW § 102 : NY Code - Section 102: Definitions [Электронный ресурс] // FindLaw. - Режим доступа: http:// codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/SAP/1/102 (дата обращения: 07.11.2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">N.Y. SAP. LAW § 102 : NY Code - Section 102: Definitions [Электронный ресурс] // FindLaw. - Режим доступа: http:// codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/SAP/1/102 (дата обращения: 07.11.2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pierce, R. Administrative law and process / R. Pierce, S. A. Shapiro, P. R. Verkuil. - 3th ed. - New York : Foundation Press, 1999. - 681 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pierce, R. Administrative law and process / R. Pierce, S. A. Shapiro, P. R. Verkuil. - 3th ed. - New York : Foundation Press, 1999. - 681 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pound, R. Growth of the Administrative Process: A Reappraisal. Foreword / R. Pound // Federal Bar Journal. - 1956. - October-December. Vol. 16. - P. 450-451.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pound, R. Growth of the Administrative Process: A Reappraisal. Foreword / R. Pound // Federal Bar Journal. - 1956. - October-December. Vol. 16. - P. 450-451.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Swire, P. P. Incorporation of Independent Agencies into the executive branch / P. P. Swire // Yale Law Review. - 1985. - № 94. - P. 1766-1786.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Swire, P. P. Incorporation of Independent Agencies into the executive branch / P. P. Swire // Yale Law Review. - 1985. - № 94. - P. 1766-1786.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Verkuil, P. R. The purposes and limits of independent agencies / P. R. Verkuil // Duke Law Journal. - 1988. - № 2. - P. 257-279.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Verkuil, P. R. The purposes and limits of independent agencies / P. R. Verkuil // Duke Law Journal. - 1988. - № 2. - P. 257-279.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wiener v. United States 357 U.S. 349 (1958) [Электронный ресурс] // Justia. - Режим доступа: https://supreme.justia. com/cases/federal/us/357/349/case.html (дата обращения: 10.10.2015).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wiener v. United States 357 U.S. 349 (1958) [Электронный ресурс] // Justia. - Режим доступа: https://supreme.justia. com/cases/federal/us/357/349/case.html (дата обращения: 10.10.2015).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
