<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">slr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Сибирское юридическое обозрение</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Siberian Law Review</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2658-7602</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-7610</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Сибирский юридический университет</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19073/2306-1340-2016-3-65-68</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">slr-589</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>УГОЛОВНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС (архивный раздел)</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CRIMINAL PROCEDURE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>НЕКОТОРЫЕ НЕСОГЛАСИЯ С ПОНЯТИЕМ «СОГЛАСИЕ» В УГОЛОВНОМ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Some Disagreements with the Concept of “Consent” in Criminal Proceedings</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Марфицин</surname><given-names>Павел Григорьевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Marfitsin</surname><given-names>Pavel G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">pavel@marfitsin.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н. И. Лобачевского</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>65</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Марфицин П.Г., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Марфицин П.Г.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Marfitsin P.G.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/589">https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/589</self-uri><abstract><p>Настоящая статья продолжает серию публикаций автора, которые можно объединить общим названием «Качество уголовно-процессуального законодательства». В ней на основе проведенного анализа высказаны критические суждения по поводу содержания дефиниции «согласие», закрепленной в ст. 5 УПК РФ и отнесенной законодателем к числу основных понятий. На основе этого обоснованы и внесены предложения по совершенствованию законодательства.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The present article is a continuation of the author's publications which can be entitled "The Quality of Criminal Procedural Legislation". The estimate made led to critical judgements of the content of the definition "consent" given in Article 5 of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation and reckoned by the legislator among the main concepts. The author gives grounds and makes suggestions for improvements in the legislation.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>уголовное судопроизводство</kwd><kwd>основные понятия</kwd><kwd>согласие</kwd><kwd>субъекты</kwd><kwd>процедура</kwd><kwd>руководитель следственного органа</kwd><kwd>прокурор</kwd><kwd>следователь</kwd><kwd>дознаватель</kwd><kwd>criminal proceedings</kwd><kwd>main concepts</kwd><kwd>consent</kwd><kwd>subjects</kwd><kwd>procedure</kwd><kwd>chief of investigation body</kwd><kwd>prosecutor</kwd><kwd>investigator</kwd><kwd>interrogator</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ожегов С. И. Словарь русского языка / С. И. Ожегов. - М. : Рус. яз., 1984. - 816 с</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ожегов С. И. Словарь русского языка / С. И. Ожегов. - М. : Рус. яз., 1984. - 816 с</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
