slrСибирское юридическое обозрениеSiberian Law Review2658-76022658-7610Сибирский юридический университетslr-1248Research ArticleГРАЖДАНСКОЕ ПРАВО И ГРАЖДАНСКИЙ ПРОЦЕСС (архивный раздел)О ключевых идеях правового регулирования заключения договоров субъектами естественных монополий по законодательству ЕвросоюзаАндреевИ. А.noemail@neicon.ruУральская государственная юридическая академияRussian Federation2009301220090115256Copyright © Андреев И.А., 20092009Андреев И.А.Андреев И.А.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.siberianlawreview.ru/jour/article/view/1248ReferencesСм.: Imelda Maher. Re-imagining the Story of European Competition Law // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2000. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 161.См.: Imelda Maher. Re-imagining the Story of European Competition Law // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2000. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 161.См.: Цвайгерт К., Кетц Х. Введение в сравнительное правоведение в сфере частного права. В 2 т. Т. 2. М. : Междунар. отношения, 2000. С. 17.См.: Цвайгерт К., Кетц Х. Введение в сравнительное правоведение в сфере частного права. В 2 т. Т. 2. М. : Междунар. отношения, 2000. С. 17.См.: Ariel Katz. The potential demise of another natural monopoly: rethinking the collective administration of performing rights // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2005. Vol. 1. № 3. P. 548.См.: Ariel Katz. The potential demise of another natural monopoly: rethinking the collective administration of performing rights // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2005. Vol. 1. № 3. P. 548.См.: Richard A. Posner. Citations Analysis in Law // American Law and Economics Review. 2000.Vol. 2. № 2. P. 385.См.: Richard A. Posner. Citations Analysis in Law // American Law and Economics Review. 2000.Vol. 2. № 2. P. 385.См.: Ernesto Schargrodsky. Do Publicly Traded Firms Price Differently from Private Firms? // American Law and Economics Review. 2003. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 33.См.: Ernesto Schargrodsky. Do Publicly Traded Firms Price Differently from Private Firms? // American Law and Economics Review. 2003. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 33.См.: Paul V. Dunmore. Economic Competition between Professional Bodies: The Case of Auditing // American Law and Economics Review. 2001. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 306.См.: Paul V. Dunmore. Economic Competition between Professional Bodies: The Case of Auditing // American Law and Economics Review. 2001. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 306.См.: Michael L. Smith. Deterrence and Origin of Legal System // American Law and Economics Review. 2005. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 350.См.: Michael L. Smith. Deterrence and Origin of Legal System // American Law and Economics Review. 2005. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 350.См.: Henry Hansmann. Corporation and Contract // American Law and Economics Review. 2006. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 4.См.: Henry Hansmann. Corporation and Contract // American Law and Economics Review. 2006. Vol. 8. № 1. P. 4.См.: Friedrich Kratochwil. The Limits of Contract // European Journal of International Law. 1994. Vol. 5. № 1. Р. 469-470.См.: Friedrich Kratochwil. The Limits of Contract // European Journal of International Law. 1994. Vol. 5. № 1. Р. 469-470.См.: Mario Forni. Using Stationarity Tests in Antitrust Market Definition // American Law and Economics Review. 2004. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 442.См.: Mario Forni. Using Stationarity Tests in Antitrust Market Definition // American Law and Economics Review. 2004. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 442.См.: Damien Geradin, Nicolas Petit. Price discrimination under EC competition law: another antitrust doctrine in search of limiting principles? // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2006. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 489.См.: Damien Geradin, Nicolas Petit. Price discrimination under EC competition law: another antitrust doctrine in search of limiting principles? // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2006. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 489.См.: David S. Evans, A. Jorge Padilla. Excessive prices: using economics to define administrable rules // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2005. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 121.См.: David S. Evans, A. Jorge Padilla. Excessive prices: using economics to define administrable rules // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2005. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 121.См.: Jonathan Harrish. Contractual Freedom in the Conflict of Laws // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2000. Vol. 20. №. 2. P. 260.См.: Jonathan Harrish. Contractual Freedom in the Conflict of Laws // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2000. Vol. 20. №. 2. P. 260.См.: Dennis L. Weisman. When can regulation defer to competition for constraining market power?: complements and critical elasticities // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2006. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 101.См.: Dennis L. Weisman. When can regulation defer to competition for constraining market power?: complements and critical elasticities // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2006. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 101.См.: Rick Bigwood. Contracts by Unfair Advantage: From Exploitation to Transactional Neglect // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2005. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 77.См.: Rick Bigwood. Contracts by Unfair Advantage: From Exploitation to Transactional Neglect // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2005. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 77.См.: Dori Kimel. Neutrality, Autonomy, and Freedom of Contract // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2001. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 478.См.: Dori Kimel. Neutrality, Autonomy, and Freedom of Contract // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2001. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 478.См.: Paul Klemperet. Bidding markets // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2007. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 32.См.: Paul Klemperet. Bidding markets // Journal of Competition Law and Economics. 2007. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 32.См.: Laura Nyantung Beny. Do Insider Trading Laws Matter? Some Preliminary Comparative Evidence // American Law and Economics Review. 2005. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 174.См.: Laura Nyantung Beny. Do Insider Trading Laws Matter? Some Preliminary Comparative Evidence // American Law and Economics Review. 2005. Vol. 7. № 1. P. 174.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.